I am intrigued. I love nature, always have, but I am not a birdwatcher.
Indeed, if I had to choose, I would probably more interested in insects than birds.
And hence my question: what is it that makes birdwatching so popular?
I understand the love of nature. But why not, say, insect-watching, or mammalian-watching? What is it that makes birds so attractive, so that the number of bird-watchers greatly outnumbers (in my experience at least) those of other animal-watchers?
Is it that birds are so varied, and readily available? (It's not easy to be a mole-watcher, or a mountain-goat watcher, for instance). Is it the fact that even by staying in a single place (a corner of the woods, for instance), the year-round variety of birds is so much greater than that of, say, mammalians? Is it that people relate more to birds than, say, insects? What is it?
I apologize for the seemingly naive question... but I would be quite interested in your perspective.
Luca
Indeed, if I had to choose, I would probably more interested in insects than birds.
And hence my question: what is it that makes birdwatching so popular?
I understand the love of nature. But why not, say, insect-watching, or mammalian-watching? What is it that makes birds so attractive, so that the number of bird-watchers greatly outnumbers (in my experience at least) those of other animal-watchers?
Is it that birds are so varied, and readily available? (It's not easy to be a mole-watcher, or a mountain-goat watcher, for instance). Is it the fact that even by staying in a single place (a corner of the woods, for instance), the year-round variety of birds is so much greater than that of, say, mammalians? Is it that people relate more to birds than, say, insects? What is it?
I apologize for the seemingly naive question... but I would be quite interested in your perspective.
Luca