• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Where premium quality meets exceptional value. ZEISS Conquest HDX.

White-crowned Sparrow subspecies, California (1 Viewer)

BAL Land

Well-known member
United States
Hi all,
These photos are from about 2 weeks ago in Orange County, California. The lower black stripe on the face doesn’t go all the way to the eye, instead ending behind the eye, leaving a latch of white between the eye and the bill. Is this just an odd variation, a leucistic bird, or a different ssp? Thanks!

These are my only two photos.




587A60C6-8C0D-404E-9A79-5C7B0A64B6FE.jpeg

F486E311-04CB-4F78-AD47-D5EA8B5DD36B.jpeg
 
I don't understand, I'm afraid. I guess you're talking about the supercilium ('lower black stripe on the face') - and in these photos it runs backwards from immediately behind the eye - and the whole lore is pale and unmarked - yes? As far as I can see, this is normal - as your field guide will show.
 
This looks like a fairly normal White-crowned Sparrow of the gambelii subspecies, breeding in Alaska, the Yukon, and interior British Columbia and commonly wintering in California.
 
Last edited:
I don't understand, I'm afraid. I guess you're talking about the supercilium ('lower black stripe on the face') - and in these photos it runs backwards from immediately behind the eye - and the whole lore is pale and unmarked - yes? As far as I can see, this is normal - as your field guide will show.
This is not typical. Here is an example of a “normal” Gambel’s subspecies. Notice how the lore is gray, not pure white like in my photos. I have received feedback from another sight also saying Gambel’s, and that it’s just an odd variant.
 
This is not typical. Here is an example of a “normal” Gambel’s subspecies. Notice how the lore is gray, not pure white like in my photos. I have received feedback from another sight also saying Gambel’s, and that it’s just an odd variant.
This is why I said "fairly normal" - you are right that the form usually has gray lores, but if you look at enough photos of them you can see that a percentage do have quite white lores.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 2 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top