• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Where premium quality meets exceptional value. ZEISS Conquest HDX.

Which lens for a Nikon D40? (1 Viewer)

Steve66

Member
Hi there.

I have a Nikon D40 and I would like some advice as to which lens would be good for birding shots. Now I know everybody is going to say get a new camera but for the time being this is the camera I have (it's actually my wife's so keeping in Nikon we can share lenses).

I was thinking about Nikon 70-300mm f4-f 5.6 ED AF D but this will only work in manual focus on the D40.

Would this lens be in the right direction as I will be updating to a higher spec body at some point in the nearish future. Or would it be better to get a lower end lens and then replace the whole lot?

I have searched the forum and I am thinking of the D300, am I right in thinking this lens would be good for this body also?

I look forward to you thoughts.
 
Hi Steve,
There is now alot more choice of af lenses that are compatible with the D40. Sigma & tamron now do lenses with af motors fitted. 300mm is a little short for birds & the general consensus is that 400mm is the minimum. There is the 150-500mm stabilised lens from sigma, which i believe gets good reviews (google it) or if you want to stay with Nikon, try the 300mm f4 with a 1.4x teleconverter (giving you 420mm f5.6). All depends on your budget really
Regards
Rob.
 
There is the 150-500mm stabilised lens from sigma, which i believe gets good reviews (google it)...

it's had some good and some bad reviews - I looked into this lens for a friend, I read lots of reviews, talked to some folk who owned it and tested one myself - I was massively unimressed. I woould suggest that anyone considering this lens should look at the old 50-500 instead (don't know if it works with the D40), it may not have OS but it's better optically.
 
it's had some good and some bad reviews - I looked into this lens for a friend, I read lots of reviews, talked to some folk who owned it and tested one myself - I was massively unimressed. I woould suggest that anyone considering this lens should look at the old 50-500 instead (don't know if it works with the D40), it may not have OS but it's better optically.

Hi Pete,
There does seem to be a bit of varience in reviews for this lens. The 50-500 has an internal motor (HSM) & probably would be a better bet if you can get one.
Regards
Rob.
 
Hi.

Thanks for the replies.

I have got a second hand Nikkor 70-300mm f/4-5.6 AF D ED which should work ok other than the AF bit.

This should be a suitable stop gap until I have saved enough for a D90/300.

Cheers
 
Hi Steve.

I was recently in a similar position to you, but with a Nikon D80.

All I can tell you is that I bought a 70-300 zoom, and kept it for about 3 weeks, as it just wasn't long enough. I've now sold it on and bought a 170-500 instead; I haven't had much opportunity to try it yet, but I already know I am much happier with the longer reach it gives me.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 16 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top