It does seem you may have cried 3 times here....A few, 8x42 NL Pure, Ultravid HD+ 8x32, and so lovely much older 8X30 SLC Swarovski MkII. All have a place, the NLs are largely for astro and birding, the UVids are walking binos, and the SLCs live in the van. I'm not rich at all between, just a buy once, cry once sort of bloke.
I envy you your Common Kingfisher, ours is rather drab.This morning I took the little Nikon with me as i was not in the mood for watching birds but afterwards i was very glad that i did because i saw a beautiful common kingfisher. This nifty little Nikon surprises me everytime i use it!
View attachment 1586578View attachment 1586582
Nice glass. I also like the fact you called it a double bridge, never understood calling these things open bridges. Enjoy.My current favourite - the Meopta Air HD 8x42 which was on sale by German seller "Frankonia", a well known hunting goods store here in Germany. Price was just too good as eBay added a 50€ coupon on top which brought the price lower than many of the (most likely) Kamakura-models sold by DDoptics, Kite, gpo, et al. Arrived a couple of days ago actually but I didn't have time to take a few pics.
Overall great optics, I'd rate them slightly above my Fuji HC - FoV is wider (even though on paper they shouldn't be - but Canip already established that the Fuji has only 7.7 instead of claimed 8° and the Air HD has a stated 7.9 but somehow seems wider.
An interesting problem and an advantage as well as disadvantage is the super long eye relief. On the one hand, I can view the whole FoV comfortably with my glasses, on the other hand I get blackouts when the eye cups touch my eye sockets without glasses. So I need to do the old, rest bino on eyebrows trick. Slightly longer eye cups would fix the issue. But on walks/hikes it's actually great because taking off the glasses is annoying anyway. Still, the eye box is rather unforgiving but the view makes up for it so I'll rather learn how to use these and not send them back. I was on the fence a few days about them. But optically, mechanically and as far as the handling is concerned - I like the double bridge - those are pretty nice. I won't bother taking pics through the bino though. Those never come out well with my crappy cell phone cam. They are rather sharp, very low on false color off axis and it's pretty much absent in the center. But far more experienced users have reviewed them like Binomania.it
I don't have much to add to those reviews. (edit - forgot one thing though that isn't even mentioned by Meopta themselves - they really know how to "undersell" a product if they don't mention it - there's definitely field flatteners involved, even a slight "Absam ring" can be noticed.)
But these lenses do look lovely I have to say.
View attachment 1587445View attachment 1587446View attachment 1587447
Thanks . That's actually just the translation of the German word for it, "Doppelbrücke", double bridge but it could also be called open bridge.Nice glass. I also like the fact you called it a double bridge, never understood calling these things open bridges. Enjoy.
Meopta rocksMy current favourite - the Meopta Meopro Air HD 8x42 which was on sale by German seller "Frankonia", a well known hunting goods store here in Germany. Price was just too good as eBay added a 50€ coupon on top which brought the price lower than many of the (most likely) Kamakura-models sold by DDoptics, Kite, gpo, et al. Arrived a couple of days ago actually but I didn't have time to take a few pics.
Overall great optics, I'd rate them slightly above my Fuji HC - FoV is wider (even though on paper they shouldn't be - but Canip already established that the Fuji has only 7.7 instead of claimed 8° and the Air HD has a stated 7.9 but somehow seems wider.
An interesting problem and an advantage as well as disadvantage is the super long eye relief. On the one hand, I can view the whole FoV comfortably with my glasses, on the other hand I get blackouts when the eye cups touch my eye sockets without glasses. So I need to do the old, rest bino on eyebrows trick. Slightly longer eye cups would fix the issue. But on walks/hikes it's actually great because taking off the glasses is annoying anyway. Still, the eye box is rather unforgiving but the view makes up for it so I'll rather learn how to use these and not send them back. I was on the fence a few days about them. But optically, mechanically and as far as the handling is concerned - I like the double bridge - those are pretty nice. I won't bother taking pics through the bino though. Those never come out well with my crappy cell phone cam. They are rather sharp, very low on false color off axis and it's pretty much absent in the center. But far more experienced users have reviewed them like Binomania.it
I don't have much to add to those reviews. (edit - forgot one thing though that isn't even mentioned by Meopta themselves - they really know how to "undersell" a product if they don't mention it - there's definitely field flatteners involved, even a slight "Absam ring" can be noticed.)
But these lenses do look lovely I have to say.
View attachment 1587445View attachment 1587446View attachment 1587447
I think this is the first time I’ve seen these in black, very nice.I've been using these a lot. In the garden and on my everyday walks. 7x21 Curio semi-leatherette edition
View attachment 1587535View attachment 1587536
Thank you, Paul. The leatherette is not original. I used self-adhesive leatherette from a camera repair shop to mod these. They feel a bit safer now in my hands. My first attempt to cut out the Swarovski-bird failed dismally. That is why they're semi -leatherette for now.I think this is the first time I’ve seen these in black, very nice.
Thanks Maljunulo, that surely is a variation of "a man with only one testicle probably knows how to use it"To paraphrase another famous saying .... "A man with only one binocular probably knows how to use it."