-
Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.
Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
What magnification level would you recommend? (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter beth55xx
- Start date
That is a very personal choise. I prefer 7x, max. 8x. I really don't like 10x. I'm to shakey for them. 7x gives me enough magnification and a relax steady image.
squidge
Wha Whassssat
I use 8x at the moment but I've noticed that a lot of my birding recently involves seawatching or looking over large expanses so I've been thinking about getting a 10x. 8x is fine for woodland, hedgerow and general birding but I feel the extra 2x is needed for seawatching and moorland birding. So I guess its personal preference for general use but for me its 8x with getting the 10x for when I need the extra reach. Ger.
FrankD
Well-known member
My thoughts as well. I would probably be using a 7x42 as my primary binocular right now if I could find one that was reasonably priced and offered the performance level that I prefer. With the market so sparse with a 7x42 of this criteria I tend to lean towards 8x42s and 8x32s.
Doctor Twitchings
Well-known member
In my opinion it's a no brainer - 10x. I always want as close a view as possible of every bird I see, and 10x is the most powerful binocular that is widely used. I think 12x is too powerful for general birding. I use 10 x 32 Leicas - light, compact and powerful.
Hi Beth,
I think general advice might be 6 or 7x is fine for gardens and woodland, and 10x for bigger distances. Most people's hands are not steady enough to use higher powers than that. If you do a bit of everything then 8x is probably the most versatile. Normally lower powers have a wider view and more in focus making it easier to find the birds.
Where I live, I find 7x is most useful, but I might take a higher power if I think they might be needed.
Nice drawings by the way.
David
I think general advice might be 6 or 7x is fine for gardens and woodland, and 10x for bigger distances. Most people's hands are not steady enough to use higher powers than that. If you do a bit of everything then 8x is probably the most versatile. Normally lower powers have a wider view and more in focus making it easier to find the birds.
Where I live, I find 7x is most useful, but I might take a higher power if I think they might be needed.
Nice drawings by the way.
David
John Russell
Well-known member
Frank,
You surely can't have forgotten the Meopta B1?
I believe there are only 3 other quality 7x42 roofs still in production, the Leica Ultravid HD, the Nikon EDG and the Zeiss FL, but all three are in a much higher price category.
We still have a 7x42 Meopta and a 7x42 Swaro SLC in the family. I also have a 10x42 FL but every time I pick up a 7x42 the wide, steady and easy view is a real delight. No shortage of eye relief either with the lower magnifications and longer focal length eyepieces.
John
Pinewood
New York correspondent
Hello Beth,
There is no one binocular for all situations. I like eight power for general use, but my ideal kit is a 7x42 and a 10x32, using the 10x32, when needed.
Edit: I just read in another post that you are thirteen years-old. If you can hold a ten steady, at your age, then it would be many decades before shakes might become a problem.
Happy bird watching,
Arthur Pinewood :hi:
There is no one binocular for all situations. I like eight power for general use, but my ideal kit is a 7x42 and a 10x32, using the 10x32, when needed.
Edit: I just read in another post that you are thirteen years-old. If you can hold a ten steady, at your age, then it would be many decades before shakes might become a problem.
Happy bird watching,
Arthur Pinewood :hi:
Last edited:
Jonathan B.
Well-known member
Hi Beth,
Welcome to Birdforum. Your drawings are exceptional, so whatever you do in life, don't stop drawing! You clearly have a future as a wildlife artist or scientific illustrator.
At your age you can probably hold 10X steady, and if you like the view, stick with it. However as magnification decreases, the depth of the image that is in focus increases, and the more "relaxed" and natural the view appears. That is why I use only 7X and 8X binoculars.
I strongly suggest that you go to a store where you can try out binoculars of different magnifications. Ideally they would let you try them outdoors.
Good luck.
Never underestimate the weight of bins these young girls can hold. I remember being in a hide when a group of girls came and as there was shortage of glass so I let three look through my 10x50 BA. They held them up for a long period with no shakes, when I asked if they were to heavy they said no and the bins were nice and clear.
Beth, visit a shop or two and try the differant sizes.
Chris.
Beth, visit a shop or two and try the differant sizes.
Chris.
Purple Martin
Well-known member
Up until recently I would have said 8x. But I have come around to the opinion that 7x is the best "all around" magnification (brighter, larger FOV, steadier). Actually, either one will work well. Occasionally I prefer the closer view of 8.5x (I think the Audubon roof is actually nearer 9x) and I use a 15x63 (mounted) for astronomy (the smaller objective cuts down light pollution). At work I keep an old pair of Swift Sea Hawk 6x30 for just viewing out the window.
Martin
Martin
John Dracon
John Dracon
Beth - A good 7 power binocular comes closer to being ideal for most users. As we grow older, we aren't as steady as we think we are. Often a person looks through a good 6 power binocular and is surprised at the detail they can see. John
Basically, what we are all saying here is: Try as many as you can and pick the one you like the best!:king:
32mm binoculars are lighter and usually have wider fields of view than 42mm binoculars. Glass is heavy and the lenses and prisms in the 42mm binoculars are larger and heavier than those in 32mm.
Bob
32mm binoculars are lighter and usually have wider fields of view than 42mm binoculars. Glass is heavy and the lenses and prisms in the 42mm binoculars are larger and heavier than those in 32mm.
Bob
Beth,
All the advantages and disadvantages and preferences have been posted above, so you can now make an informed choice, but as always it has to be your choice. I therefore recommend you go to a Field Day and try out at least an 8x30, 8x42 and compare them with your 10x binoculars and see what works for you. In Focus and Kay Optical are 2 of several optics shops that do Field Days in the south east of England which may work for you. Details are on their websites. There are others, including some of the London Camera Exchange shops that specialze in optics.
Mark
All the advantages and disadvantages and preferences have been posted above, so you can now make an informed choice, but as always it has to be your choice. I therefore recommend you go to a Field Day and try out at least an 8x30, 8x42 and compare them with your 10x binoculars and see what works for you. In Focus and Kay Optical are 2 of several optics shops that do Field Days in the south east of England which may work for you. Details are on their websites. There are others, including some of the London Camera Exchange shops that specialze in optics.
Mark
Beth
Purple Martin
Well-known member
Let us know what you pick.
marinemaster
Well-known member
7x what I use
Leupold makes a 7x Japan made
I just got one, I really like it. It's quality is good, entry level birding.
I also like the Minox BVII because is 28oz and for a 8x I need something above 25oz to keep steady.
I also tried the Nikon 8x36 and it was steady because of the compact size.
The older lead glass Nikon 8x32 LX is good except that my fingers were crammed together too much, else it was great
7x is best compromise in my book
Leupold makes a 7x Japan made
I just got one, I really like it. It's quality is good, entry level birding.
I also like the Minox BVII because is 28oz and for a 8x I need something above 25oz to keep steady.
I also tried the Nikon 8x36 and it was steady because of the compact size.
The older lead glass Nikon 8x32 LX is good except that my fingers were crammed together too much, else it was great
7x is best compromise in my book
Tvc15_2000
Well-known member
I agree its a personal choice.
I use 10x for everything from hawk watches at distance to warblers up close.
I don't want be see what else is circling in a distant kettle of Broad wings. at 6 times magnification, I want to bring that kettle at 10 times closer. If I have time I will use the socpe and bring them 50 times closer.
I don’t want to try and ID a smaller Green Winged Teal hitchhiking in a line of Scooters a mile off shore with 7x. or 8x. I want bring that line 10 times closer. Of course not every one feels the same.
I love getting as close to the bird as I can. The more detail the better. I prefer the fame filled with the subject and am not concerned about what I am not looking at. That is my preference. My hands are steady and I can zero in on the bird at first glance (due to lots of practice).
BE AWARE:
Some people complain their hands are too shaky for 10x (if alcohol is unavailable).
But the same complainers report they can't find the bird with 10x (if alcohol is available)!
Good Luck I will be curious how you like other powers after using 10x.
Please do report back.
I use 10x for everything from hawk watches at distance to warblers up close.
I don't want be see what else is circling in a distant kettle of Broad wings. at 6 times magnification, I want to bring that kettle at 10 times closer. If I have time I will use the socpe and bring them 50 times closer.
I don’t want to try and ID a smaller Green Winged Teal hitchhiking in a line of Scooters a mile off shore with 7x. or 8x. I want bring that line 10 times closer. Of course not every one feels the same.
I love getting as close to the bird as I can. The more detail the better. I prefer the fame filled with the subject and am not concerned about what I am not looking at. That is my preference. My hands are steady and I can zero in on the bird at first glance (due to lots of practice).
BE AWARE:
Some people complain their hands are too shaky for 10x (if alcohol is unavailable).
But the same complainers report they can't find the bird with 10x (if alcohol is available)!
Good Luck I will be curious how you like other powers after using 10x.
Please do report back.
Last edited:
Hi beth55xx,
The question is what are you trying to improve in your binoculars.
Is it simply that your current pair is optically marginal or are there specific issues?
Magnification per se is not a good primary criterion. Imho. 10x or 12x glasses are quite wonderful for birding, just as are lower power 7x or 8x models. They just have different strengths and only you can decide what best suits you, the extra reach of the higher power or the wider field and more relaxed view of the lower power.
Issues such as waterproofing and warranties come after optical performance, but fortunately the current offerings of inexpensive good glass are the best ever, so you have lots of choices.
Pricewise, I think the Nikon Action Extreme waterproof porro glass sets the standard for budget glass, with a huge number of excellent roof prism glasses from Hawke, Zen Ray and many others beyond that.
High end glass, mostly from Swarovski, Leica and Zeiss is lifetime investment, unfortunately beyond the reach of most ordinary mortals. Happily you get 90% of the performance even with a low end porro costing less than a tenth as much. Plus the birds don't care.
Please let us know what you decide and why. It will help the next birder in the same position.
The question is what are you trying to improve in your binoculars.
Is it simply that your current pair is optically marginal or are there specific issues?
Magnification per se is not a good primary criterion. Imho. 10x or 12x glasses are quite wonderful for birding, just as are lower power 7x or 8x models. They just have different strengths and only you can decide what best suits you, the extra reach of the higher power or the wider field and more relaxed view of the lower power.
Issues such as waterproofing and warranties come after optical performance, but fortunately the current offerings of inexpensive good glass are the best ever, so you have lots of choices.
Pricewise, I think the Nikon Action Extreme waterproof porro glass sets the standard for budget glass, with a huge number of excellent roof prism glasses from Hawke, Zen Ray and many others beyond that.
High end glass, mostly from Swarovski, Leica and Zeiss is lifetime investment, unfortunately beyond the reach of most ordinary mortals. Happily you get 90% of the performance even with a low end porro costing less than a tenth as much. Plus the birds don't care.
Please let us know what you decide and why. It will help the next birder in the same position.
