• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Where premium quality meets exceptional value. ZEISS Conquest HDX.

US, TX - Help ID'ing this ... parrot? (1 Viewer)

erisian.pope

very amateur
Rumor has it that we have a population of now-wild parrots here in Austin. This would be due to a pet-store closing. I've seen a couple of these birds around town. Does anyone know what it is? (Google searching suggests Monk Parakeets - is this accurate?)

Also, how do people classify birds like this? They are presumably not native here, and are presumably the result of domestic birds that were set "free" and have naturalized...? I would assume that releasing pet species into the wild is not condoned (seems pretty terrible to me) but would these be classified similarly to other introduced species (like European Starlings in the US) or is there another way to describe this kind of process?

(If this topic is a faux-pas overall, please let me know and forgive my blunder!)
 

Attachments

  • IMG_8763.JPG
    IMG_8763.JPG
    283.5 KB · Views: 130
Monk Parakeets have established populations in various cities all over the U.S. - shoreline of CT (my stomping grounds), NY, I've read IL, OR, I'm sure FL...

I'm pretty sure that if there's a population in Austin it's not the result of a pet store closing recently.
"Monk Parakeets were first found in Austin during the early 1980s, and have bred here for over 20 years."
Blog link: http://birdchaser.blogspot.com/2006/02/back-in-austin.html

I assume their status varies state-to-state, but at least in CT we viewed them as a self-sustaining, introduced population - like House Sparrows, European Starlings, or Rock Pigeons. Except prettier. And prone to nest on our powerlines... (big debate).
 
I beg to differ and reckon it's a Quaker Parakeet! :-O

as a ps: the wild populations of these communal nesting parakeets were not from 'domestic stock'. They appear to be naturally extending their range northwards from south america.
 
Last edited:
as a ps: the wild populations of these communal nesting parakeets were not from 'domestic stock'. They appear to be naturally extending their range northwards from south america.

I'm assuming your postscript was meant as a joke...?
 
Warning! This thread is more than 16 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top