• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Where premium quality meets exceptional value. ZEISS Conquest HDX.

U.S. - South Texas Bird in Alabama? (2 Viewers)

Amateur alert! I may be way off base, but I looked up this bird in my nifty Kaufman field guide and I think it looks like a Couch or Tropical Kingbird. That would be remarkable, because their range is supposedly south Texas. This one was on the Alabama Gulf Coast in a marshy area right on the Gulf of Mexico. He (?) was eating bugs.

Anyway, can anybody confirm or set me straight? Thanks for looking!
 

Attachments

  • sendDSC_0110.jpg
    sendDSC_0110.jpg
    44.5 KB · Views: 116
Doesn't the pale/white feathering on the outer edges of the tail make this a Western Kingbird? Looks pretty definitive to me. Still a nice find for Alabama.
 
Last edited:
My first impression was Western Kingbird. I think the subsequent photos confirm that. In addition to the white outer tail feathers (which I understand Cassin's can sometimes show), notice the dark, square (rather than notched) tail.

But still a good find as Streatham says.

I wouldn't even think of separating Couch's and Tropical from this one shot.

Sibley does say regarding Tropical and Couch's "reliably distinguished only by voice".

Best,
Jim
 
Last edited:
Thanks again, everyone :) I didn't notice the white on the tail at first. Thanks for pointing that out. Still nice to see him in our neck of the woods!
 
Yes of course- Western!- what was I thinking? Regarding ID of Couch's vs. Tropical, its a bit like Willow and Alder flys- although voice is certainly the most reliable way to ID them, there are one or two other characteristics (this case bill length and habitat) that lean towards an ID while you wait for them to sing.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 16 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top