Larry Sweetland
Formerly 'Larry Wheatland'
is Midget Flowerpecker smaller than Pygmy Flowerpecker? Love the name, and wondered if it too should be on the list.
is Midget Flowerpecker smaller than Pygmy Flowerpecker? Love the name, and wondered if it too should be on the list.
really the smallest birds are those with the lowest volume....
what are the least voluminous birds on the planet, that's what I wanna know
Indeed, volume, the best "size" measure of all! And nowadays, with modern 3D imaging techniques, probably not even all that difficult to calculate. No more drowning birds in tubs of water and measuring the displacement.
![]()
Well, I'm now a convert. Birds should certainly be measured by volume. But should we use metric or imperial? There would of course be a certain charm in using fluid ounces and pints, or even gallons for the larger species such as swans and eagles (should that be US or UK gallons?), but I guess we should really use ml and litres (aka liters) if we are to be more inclusive and modern, or dare I say it, fully scientific.
As Andy points out, trapped air could be a problem. Dunking for a suitable length of time would of course be a solution*, but since we don't wish the subjects to expire (I assume), I imagine some kind of breathing tube apparatus should be used? Very much looking forward to the next generation of field guides including volumes, pulse rates and average distance covered.
*(The solution is the solution?)
(Apologies to the OP for being such a helpful lot... )
Well, I'm now a convert. Birds should certainly be measured by volume.
"The only way to go" is an expression meaning "the best way to go" which (IMHO, of course) weight is in this case.
But then you get what most people– certainly most sensible people – consider anomalous results, magpies "bigger" than crows and kestrels "smaller" than widowbirds..
I suppose whoever made that particular list didn't use weight then.
So do you think that all official authorities out there are wrong when they declared bee hummingbird as a smallest living bird ?
No, I don't, your point being. . .??
@Kratter
Hummingbird weights from Dunning:
Peruvian Sheartail mean = 1.9 g (N=3)
Bee Hummingbird,= 2.2 g (N= 4)
Does it matter?
Surely what is more important is how secure the species' populations and habitats are,
or is this thread just a bit of trivia?
@Kratter
Hummingbird weights from Dunning:
Peruvian Sheartail mean = 1.9 g (N=3)
Bee Hummingbird,= 2.2 g (N= 4)
But from del Hoyo, Handbook of the Birds of the World:@Kratter
Hummingbird weights from Dunning:
Peruvian Sheartail mean = 1.9 g (N=3)
Bee Hummingbird,= 2.2 g (N= 4)
Although I love Hummingbirds - A fun list would be, 'Short Birds with Small Tails'. Not including Hummerz.............
Rifleman, Crombec, etc............