• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Where premium quality meets exceptional value. ZEISS Conquest HDX.

The Harlequin Ladybird (1 Viewer)

Bubbs

Well-known member
It looks like our Ladybirds could be under threat from the cannibal Harlequin Ladybird. This is now the commonest LB in the states and is now in the UK and range expanding.

If the radio reports are anything to go by we should be concerned, not just by the threat to our LB's but by the fact that many people in the states have been hospitalised by the bite of the Harlequin.

http://www.harlequin-survey.org/

Perhaps our friends in the USA could post more info for us.

John.
 
Last edited:
I think they are becoming quite a problem.
There is a rather interesting article in the most recent Atropos magazine on them if you want to read more about their status in this country
 
Well people in USA do go to their doctors and lawyers whenever there's a chance of compensation: there's no evidence that 'harlequin' ladybird bites are worse than any other ladybird, indeed any beetle, bite. However, when they are present in vast numbers there is obviously a better chance of being bitten!

Harmonia axyridis, the 'harlequin' is now the most abundant ladybird in inner London and in many other towns in south-eastern England. It is currently flying in some numbers - look out for them and *please* report any observations.

john barclay said:
If the radio reports are anything to go by we should be concerned, not just by the threat to our LB's but by the fact that many people in the states have been hospitalised by the bite of the Harlequin.
http://www.harlequin-survey.org/

Perhaps our friends in the USA could post more info for us.

John.
 
Can anyone please confirm that these are Harlequins?

Are they examples of the three forms (succinea, spectabilis and conspicua)?

I found them today stuck in my conservatory here in Surrey.

How widespread are Harlequins now?
 

Attachments

  • ladybird.bmp
    1.4 MB · Views: 162
Yes - in that order from bottom to top.
It's not unusual for the species to come indoors at this time of year (one of its common names is the hallowe'en ladybird).
The map at http://www.harlequin-survey.org/ is fairly up-to-date although it is also present in S. Yorks and Lancashire.


Sean F said:
Can anyone please confirm that these are Harlequins?

Are they examples of the three forms (succinea, spectabilis and conspicua)?

I found them today stuck in my conservatory here in Surrey.

How widespread are Harlequins now?
 
This appears to be an example of the succinea form with the spots merging to almost form ragged bands. The pronotum is unusual in that it is black, like the conspicua form, rather than white with an 'M' pattern. I've recorded large numbers of harlequins and this is the first I've seen like this.
 

Attachments

  • Haxy.jpg
    Haxy.jpg
    58.8 KB · Views: 113
As the winter gets colder, new ladybirds get darker with the black spots merging and some quite unusual patterns appearing! There have been two or three examples of all-black individuals this year. In all cases the white sides of the pronotum persist.
The beast is still active and still spreading with further records from Wales and appearances in all English counties except Shropshire and the far north.

Mis said:
This appears to be an example of the succinea form with the spots merging to almost form ragged bands. The pronotum is unusual in that it is black, like the conspicua form, rather than white with an 'M' pattern. I've recorded large numbers of harlequins and this is the first I've seen like this.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 19 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top