See BBC news article:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-22583431
Is this really a first for NI/ROI?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-22583431
Is this really a first for NI/ROI?
Big twitch for NI birders then..... do RoI birders cross the border into the UK?
John
Yes people from the Republic Of Ireland are allowed to cross the border.
I'm sorry, I was insufficiently precise. I wondered whether the foreign birders who seem baffled by the arrival of British twitchers at their rarity sites ever cross into the UK to tick off foreign birds.
Hope that defines the question better.
Cheers
John
Most RoI birders that would tick the tawny owl would put it on their Irish List since the bird is in Ireland.
Is it? I admit I can't tell one county from another over there. I thought Down was in Ulster and hence the UK, not Ireland, my mistake. Luckily its all British Isles.
John
Co. Down is in Ulster which is in the Island of Ireland. That is why Irish Birders would tick it as an Irish bird. The fact that Co. Down is part of the UK is irrelevant. Republic of Ireland is not part of the British Isles
The Times Atlas would disagree with you... It's a geographic, not a political term, although you're welcome to put the case for a change of perception!
One thought, if UKIP influences the UKr government to pull out of the EC, we could have in future Scotland and the Republic of Ireland in the EU and UKr outside it, with possibly border controls returning...:eek!:
What would happen to the various current bird tick lists?
MJB
Co. Down is in Ulster which is in the Island of Ireland. That is why Irish Birders would tick it as an Irish bird. The fact that Co. Down is part of the UK is irrelevant. Republic of Ireland is not part of the British Isles
The Irish Goverment doesn't recognise the term nor do any Irish people I know. If the Times Altas uses the term "British Isles" that's their business, but it is an outdated term.
still - the idea that Ulster is not in Ireland is equally incorrect.
As about as outdated as using the term 'the Irish Sea' to define the water that separates the two nations.
Don't see too many British jumping up and down about the use this, so why so sensitive about another geographical term that is widely and internationally recognised?
"British Isles" implies that the people of Republic of Ireland are British, which they are not. The term is from the colonial era and as such is irrelevant.
Quite agree, so to conclude:
1. It is in Ireland
2. It is in the United Kingdom
3. It is in the British Isles
All that said, it is a pretty remarkable record for a species so infrequently undertaking water crossings, surely there must be a possibility of escape? Is the species common in captivity - always seems to be Eagle Owls that escape!
"British Isles" implies that the people of Republic of Ireland are British, which they are not. The term is from the colonial era and as such is irrelevant.
Was Canada ever a colony of the USA? No it wasn't. That's the difference, boy. Ireland was a colony and that is why most Irish people do not like the term "British Isles".So is North America, which includes Canada, a colonial and irrelevant term?
You're clutching at straws dear boy.
When Scotland is independent, Wales is independent, Eire is independent and Northern Ireland hangs grimly onto its British identity, the archipelago will still be the British Isles.
John
I couldn't care less what lists people keep. As I said:And I think you will find that more and more birders faced with the choice of scything off all their British ticks seen in Scotland and Wales or finding a new geographical concept, will opt for a British Isles list.