It is indeed really confusing. While looking at their website, since many models are very similar-looking, I find it difficult to know how they organize their ranges/levels of performance. If you take Zeiss, for example, you can see that Terra is entry level (inexpensive), Conquest HD is medium and SF is top of the range (with the SFL now sitting in between the last two). You can see that the "looks" of the binoculars is distinctly different. But with Steiner is a bit confusing. As I mentioned earlier, I had the Navigator model, which shares a similar price bracket with the MM and I remember it was a disappointment. I've just checked Allbinos and to my surprise they also found it was a bit lacking for a device in the 300-400 $ range:
The best binocular tests on the net. The comprehensive database of binoculars with their parameters and users opinions. Interesting articles and comparisons.
www.allbinos.com
I wonder how mucho of the Navigator does the MM share at a similar price point.