• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Where premium quality meets exceptional value. ZEISS Conquest HDX.

Silkypix settings (1 Viewer)

Paul Tavares

Well-known member
I was wondering if anyone else is using silkpix for RAW processing. When I first got the GH1 in March 2010 I shot combined RAW and JPEG images. After two outings, I switched to RAW only and have stayed that way since. I find Silkypix pretty complete and simple once you get used to it although it's taken me until the last few months to learn a few more tricks. These are the settings I normally use for birds.

Sharpness: leave at natural. Once in a while I add some sharpness but never if the bird makes up a large part of the uncropped frame.

Saturation: I normally use standard colour bumped up to about 1.20 unless the bird has deep reds in which case something around 1.06 to 1.10. Film colour V2 gives rich colour as long as there are no greens or reds in which case it can look unnatural. Memory colour 2 is also OK but tends to darken the picture.

Contrast: Normally average standard. If light is harsh I may reduce it to a little low or low. In dull light I may increase it to a little strong contrast.

One observation, increasing the saturation and adjusting the contrast will make an image appear sharper.

White balance: I leave at Camera setting as I use auto white balance on the camera.

Exposure. I usually adjust a little bit up. What I find useful is the auto silkypix evaluation and then leave as is or adjust from there.

Crop: I usually use 8:5 as this displays well on screen. I will use 16:9 if I am preparing a slideshow for wide screen HDTV. I leave the camera on 3:2 as this is closer to 8:5. The native setting of 4:3 is too far from the 3:2, and 8:5 and sometimes you lose part of the image in cropping. Especially true for travel type photos.

Tastes: I sometimes use blue sky for restoring the blus in skies. Mostly on travel photos. rarely on bird photos.

Tilt: useful for correcting crooked images. More of a problem on travel shots with a horizon. I also use the angle correction for correcting perspective on wide angle shots.

I use the various user marks for sorting the images. I use the blue mark to note images that are in my photo life set, green means processed and I use the red for sorting purposes.

All in all a pretty good software package with more features than I will ever use.

Examples in the link below. most taken with the 100-300 but some also with the 14-140

http://rustyblades.smugmug.com/Natu...and-Updates/15416874_izQ3s#1401656696_SkVVbzv

Paul
 
Paul

Really like the puffin picture on the web site you posted.

Can I ask you - what is the advantage of using RAW rather than JPEG and will the processing of these files be ok for a complete computer idiot like myself? - is Silkypix user friendly for this?

Thanks
Graham
 
Paul

Really like the puffin picture on the web site you posted.

Can I ask you - what is the advantage of using RAW rather than JPEG and will the processing of these files be ok for a complete computer idiot like myself? - is Silkypix user friendly for this?

Thanks
Graham

Graham,

The advanatge of RAW is that it allows you to try different settings for contrast, saturation and sharpness. In camera processing to create a JPEG uses the camera settings for these parameters. You can modify them somewhat but not to the same extent as with a RAW file. With RAW you always have the initial unprocessed image to start from. The mod's are saved to different files and the original is never touched.

File sizes are not an issue. On the GH1 the JPEG file is almost as large as the RAW file.

Silkypix is pretty bare bones but relativly simple to use. I used it first and then read the manual which is written in Japanese English. I'm not pushing Silkypix over any other RAW processing software but it comes with the camera and serves my needs. I'm like you. i want to take pictures and not be bothered with a lot of technical adjustments.

Try shooting some images in both JPEG and RAW and then play with the RAW and compare the results.

The only disadvantage I can think of is that you lose EZ capability as it only works in JPEG (at least on the GH1). It's also unfortunate that Panasonic did not provide some silkypx tastes to emulate the Venus engine. Tastes are groups of settings that you can save and then apply to other images.

Paul
Photo Life List
http://rustyblades.smugmug.com/Natu...-of-the-World/15414769_Fiyot#1162196515_g6Xyf
 
Paul

Really like the puffin picture on the web site you posted.

Can I ask you - what is the advantage of using RAW rather than JPEG and will the processing of these files be ok for a complete computer idiot like myself? - is Silkypix user friendly for this?

Thanks
Graham

Graham

I should have mentioned that if you find Silkypix too complicated try using Picasa. It displays the Panasonic RAW files and does a pretty good job of adjusting the brightness, saturation etc. It handles the RAW files in the same fashion as it handles JPEG's. Export the RAW files to obtain a JPEG file with a much smaller file size.

Paul

Photo life list
http://rustyblades.smugmug.com/Natu...-of-the-World/15414769_Fiyot#1162196515_g6Xyf
 
Warning! This thread is more than 14 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top