Download the manual from this page: Pulsar Axion Compact | Pulsar Vision. You'll find the specifications in the manual.I'm currently attempting to download a manual so I can compare it to other candidates on my list, but all I get is an 864.5 kb blank pdf file. No spec sheet available.
I look forward to your report. I’ve got the older Axion 2 XQ35 which has been superseded by the XQ35 Pro. Mine is fine for spotting birds. Yours should be better, having a better sensor and wider FOV.Looks like nobody here used the Axion XQ30 Pro (or the forum is dead).
Anyway, I ordered one and may report once I got to know it.
Hermann
Can you identify animals or even birds with yours? I mean at least tell a goose from a chicken or a cat from a weasel? And if so, at what sort of distance?I look forward to your report. I’ve got the older Axion 2 XQ35 which has been superseded by the XQ35 Pro. Mine is fine for spotting birds. Yours should be better, having a better sensor and wider FOV.
Can you identify animals or even birds with yours? I mean at least tell a goose from a chicken or a cat from a weasel? And if so, at what sort of
If you can see them with your eyes you’ll be able to see the difference in shape through the thermal. There are lots of videos on YouTube which will give you a good idea about how birds and animals appear and the range. I mainly use it to see heat spots of small birds in bushes fairly close at 2x mag and then switch to bins to identify them.Can you identify animals or even birds with yours? I mean at least tell a goose from a chicken or a cat from a weasel? And if so, at what sort of distance?
No idea. A couple of friends have got Pulsars, and they are quite happy with them. So I decided to stick to Pulsar.How do the Pulsars compare with the Zeiss ones?
The Axion XQ30 Pro would work for that as long as you understand it's limitations: Once the sun comes out and there are sun spots, things become quite difficult. On wet, foggy days you may not get clear signals that there is "something". But that's a problem all thermals have to my knowledge.I really don't know which one to get. All I want it for is on twitches where I'm trying to locate a skulker, and this is usually in cover that is fairly close. So, I'm not bothered about locating stuff a long way off. I'm also not bothered about capturing images and video. I don't want to spend more on a better model, only to find the additional features are for elements I wouldn't really use. Any help much appreciated.
It works with glasses.Edit: I also need one that works well with a glasses wearer.
True. From what I've seen so far the XQ30 Pro is a very capable and well-built unit. And it's really small. It does everything I want from a thermal imager.The Axion XQ30 Pro are tiny units and benefit from the fact they have a 25mk netD and excellent European build quality.
Interesting model, and probably quite a bit better than the XQ30 Pro. However, I doubt I would have paid the extra over and above the price of the XQ30 Pro.Pulsar have just released new compact models with higher resolution 640x480 Lynred European sensors that are the same size format, just with added detection range and better detail.
Pulsar Axion Compact XG35 Thermal
I am trying to decide between the XG30 compact and XG35 compact. The XG30 has the advantage of being cheaper and a wider field of view. The XG35 has a higher magnification and greater range detection. I'm not sure that range detection is that important for bird watching purposes and believe the wider field of view of the XG30 would be more useful. I would welcome comments/opinions from others.The Axion XQ30 Pro are tiny units and benefit from the fact they have a 25mk netD and excellent European build quality. Pulsar have just released new compact models with higher resolution 640x480 Lynred European sensors that are the same size format, just with added detection range and better detail.
Pulsar Axion Compact XG35 Thermal
I am trying to decide between the XG30 compact and XG35 compact. The XG30 has the advantage of being cheaper and a wider field of view. The XG35 has a higher magnification and greater range detection. I'm not sure that range detection is that important for bird watching purposes and believe the wider field of view of the XG30 would be more useful. I would welcome comments/opinions from others.
Thanks
David
I've got a lot more experience with the XQ30 Pro by now, and I really like it. It's just like you wrote: Compact and convenient. I'd add it's light and very well made. Manual focus is no problem, after all, the magnification is only 2x. But an option to measure the temperature would really be nice. OTOH I don't need it. Not really.The Pulsar XQ30 Pro is made in Latvia by Yukon Optics, a Lithuanian company, using a 384x288, 25mK netD French-made Lynred sensor (very good specs). Lynred is a professional company that makes sensors for military and space applications (e.g. the Venus Express probe), those numbers are not going to be fudged as can be the case by some less scrupulous consumer-grade vendors.
It's really compact and convenient. I wish they had an option to measure the temperature like thermal cameras do, so it could also be used around the house (I had a Flir One that helped me find a major heat leak and save a lot of money by redoind the insulation on my bedroom roof when I had the roof redone). Focus is manual.
True. OTOH that's probably the price you pay for the small size and weight and the fairly low power consumption. Automatic mode gets on my nerves, so I settled for semi-automatic.One thing that can be annoying is the regular sensor recalibrations that pause the camera for 5 seconds. It's unavoidable with an uncooled sensor that requires compensating for the heat generated in the sensor itself. You have the option to leave it off (manual) or in semi-automatic mode, whereby the image slowly degrades until you force a recalibration.
True. However, it also works quite well during the day as long as the sun doesn't shine. But it doesn't like foggy days (or nights).As others have pointed out, it's best used at night.