• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Where premium quality meets exceptional value. ZEISS Conquest HDX.

Presume a mallard hybrid? (UK) (2 Viewers)

I presume the one in the foreground is a mallard hybrid? Just thought I'd double-check.

Sorry photo isn't great!

With thanks :)
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7723.jpg
    IMG_7723.jpg
    283.1 KB · Views: 37
Not a hybrid, a fairly common colour mutation of Mallard usually indicating some domestic descent. There are often one or two like this among "standard" Mallards on city park ponds, canals etc in the UK.
 
Not a hybrid, a fairly common colour mutation of Mallard usually indicating some domestic descent. There are often one or two like this among "standard" Mallards on city park ponds, canals etc in the UK.
Sorry but ’colour mutations’ doesn’t really describe these plumages accurately - they are domestic breed(s) of Mallards that cross bred with wild Mallard at some point or first generation escapes of domestic breeds, not simply colour variants of the same breed (as here https://www.thesprucepets.com/what-is-a-color-mutation-390489) - and not ‘usually’ but always indicating a domestic duck provenance. In this case, possibly Black Swedish or other similar domestic breed
For difference between ‘species’ and ‘breed’ see here https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320413510_Difference_Between_Breed_and_Species
 
Sorry but ’colour mutations’ doesn’t really describe these plumages accurately - they are domestic breed(s) of Mallards that cross bred with wild Mallard at some point or first generation escapes of domestic breeds, not simply colour variants of the same breed (as here https://www.thesprucepets.com/what-is-a-color-mutation-390489) - and not ‘usually’ but always indicating a domestic duck provenance. In this case, possibly Black Swedish or other similar domestic breed
For difference between ‘species’ and ‘breed’ see here https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320413510_Difference_Between_Breed_and_Species
Well we're splitting hairs (or feathers) here a bit, since domestic breeds are just artificial selection by human breeders to select for features, including coloration - all via mutation. So, tomato potato.
 
Well we're splitting hairs (or feathers) here a bit, since domestic breeds are just artificial selection by human breeders to select for features, including coloration - all via mutation. So, tomato potato.
Perhaps you are splitting hairs? - a breed encompasses more than just the colour of a birds feathers but genetical physiological differences too ie structure. I posted the difference in the paper above.

“In birds, the term "Color Mutation" refers to a bird whose feathers exhibit a different color than you would normally find in the wild.” but does not include the other physical characteristics that are identified with breed. Rather like the different morphs/forms of some species of birds in the wild - variant in colour genes only.


My point was that these ducks are actually derived from specific breeds of domestic stock, not a just a colour mutated version of wild duck (whether or not that ‘usually’ indicates domestic heritage).
 
Last edited:
Perhaps you are splitting hairs? - a breed encompasses more than just the colour of a birds feathers but genetical physiological differences too ie structure. I posted the difference in the paper above.

“In birds, the term "Color Mutation" refers to a bird whose feathers exhibit a different color than you would normally find in the wild.” but does not include the other physical characteristics that are identified with breed. Rather like the different morphs/forms of some species of birds in the wild - variant in colour genes only.


My point was that these ducks are actually derived from specific breeds of domestic stock, not a just a colour mutated version of wild duck (whether or not that ‘usually’ indicates domestic heritage).
:LOL::LOL::LOL: I'm really glad we're quoting the rigorous minds over at TheSprucePets.com for defense of proper scientific terminology use. Truly priceless.
 
:LOL::LOL::LOL: I'm really glad we're quoting the rigorous minds over at TheSprucePets.com for defense of proper scientific terminology use. Truly priceless.
Seriously Alex, I am not sure what your problem is here.

I have said nothing that isn’t correct and I don’t recall mocking any of your posts in recent history.

Colour ‘mutation‘ in wild birds


Colour mutation in domestic birds



Feel free to PM you if I have inadvertently caused you some offence otherwise farewell buddy, have a nice day 👍
 
Last edited:
Seriously Alex, I am not sure what your problem is here.

I have said nothing that isn’t correct and I don’t recall mocking any of your posts in recent history.

Feel free to PM you if I have inadvertently caused you some offence otherwise farewell buddy, have a nice day 👍
Meant no offense. Just being cheeky, and felt like you were giving Steve a hard time unnecessarily. Cheers.
 
If I disagree with something another poster says, like everyone else on the forum, I have a right to say so. I wasn’t rude. I didn’t give anyone a ‘hard time’. You have every right to disagree with me (on this occasion you are incorrect btw) but your last post was rude, disrespectful and a pathetic attempt to make me look stupid. Over and out!
 
Warning! This thread is more than 4 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top