
No, video differences comes in in a different way, using pal vs other standards etc. As far as I recall, common video is at 24 or 25 frames per second, so a difference that is negligible. Interlaced vs non-interlaced may be a bigger difference. It will probably still be worth your time looking through the video menu to make sure you know what video encoding you have available and test a couple of them out.
Niels
I'm only comparing MP4. AVCHD would be faster but no longer allows me to do much with it. And I don't have TV, so it's all PC monitor viewing anyway. Also, I'm not doing long videos, so the 4GB limitation is no problem.
Quoting from Dpreview for the FZ200: If you want to avoid the AVCHD codec entirely - which you might, since it's difficult to edit and share - then you can also use MPEG-4. You can record video at 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, and 640 x 480, all at 30 frames/second. The downside of the easy to edit and share MPEG-4 format is that recording ends when the file size hits 4GB, which takes about 24 minutes at the 1080p setting.
Compared with this info, my FZ200 has a rate of only 25 frames/second.