Or indeed (pretty much) any bill 🙄we don't see a clearly 2-toned bill
Or indeed (pretty much) any bill 🙄
Yes. The point is really that is it were mourning warbler we would see some indication of this (bill) even in a picture of this quality. It's not that species for other reasons too of courseOr indeed (pretty much) any bill 🙄
So... In a photo where the bill is (pretty much) invisible, we could expect to judge whether or not the bill is 'clearly 2-toned'. Well, we disagree on that point 👍🏻is it were mourning warbler we would see some indication of this (bill) even in a picture of this quality
No. The two-toned nature of the bill would mean that you'd be able to see something of "a bill" in this picture. Quite what the bill pattern was would likely be impossible to determine.So... In a photo where the bill is (pretty much) invisible, we could expect to judge whether or not the bill is 'clearly 2-toned'. Well, we disagree on that point 👍🏻
Sorry I'm not sure you've followed me. The fact that we cannot see any indication of a bill is the pointI still have to say I agree with Butty, I'm pretty sure we can't see anything regarding the bill that would help identification.
Not bound to since we've no way of knowing this, but it's just one of a string of different reasons for the id. One may see it as less or more strong evidence as one wishes...you'd be bound to see a bill, if it was 2-toned,
!! 🤦🏻since we've no way of knowing this
No.does butty need to have the last word?
Um.... arguments are so confusing? I'm sorry, I just don't have enough brain cells to deal with this.Yes. The point is really that is it were mourning warbler we would see some indication of this (bill) even in a picture of this quality. It's not that species for other reasons too of course
I think the line between adult male and female/immature is pretty fine, so no.Can anyone confirm if it's male or female?
Ok, thanks!I think the line between adult male and female/immature is pretty fine, so no.