• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Where premium quality meets exceptional value. ZEISS Conquest HDX.

Kingfisher Speed (2 Viewers)

Kits

Picture Picker
I was reading another forum where someone has asked if anyone knows what speed a Kingfisher flies at. I have tried my books and google, but cannot find the answer. Anyone here able to help? Thanks.
 
Kits said:
I was reading another forum where someone has asked if anyone knows what speed a Kingfisher flies at. I have tried my books and google, but cannot find the answer. Anyone here able to help? Thanks.

I had no idea Kits but found it on this site
http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/A812828

35-55km per hour

In looking I found some great pics of Kingfishers on one or two ther sites.

Cheers

oops no I didn't. put wrong one on. lol

I think this should be the correct site now
http://www.naturephoto.hu/natgeo_english/page03.html

Flippin technology!!! You can at least learn about cuckoo spit too. I was looking that up for a mate who will find this most ammusing. ;)

Come on you botanists what is your cure for cuckoo spit???
 
Last edited:
Hi Brian My pet botanist says get rid of the insects that produce the Cuckoo Spit, not too helpful I fear. i never knew how fast a kingfisher flies 35-55Km thats quite a speed, pity the poor fish no chance of escape from the fast flashing bird.

Yours PeterK
 
Hi Brian (and others!)

Thank you so much for that, most helpful. I shall pass on the information, and I know she will be grateful.

Interesting about the cuckoo spit too! :king:

Thanks again for your help.
 
Hi Brian.
Re. the 'cuckoo spit'; the little Frog Hopper bug that surrounds itself with the 'cuckoo spit' is a sap-sucker, so any systemic insecticide should do the trick, or simply blast them off with a hose. The damage they do is so negligible that it's hardly worth the bother. It's simply unsightly, and that's the main reason for removal.

All the best.
Baz.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 19 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top