• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Where premium quality meets exceptional value. ZEISS Conquest HDX.

IOC World Bird List 6.4 (1 Viewer)

Hi Keith, I had 10,649 extant spp for version 6.3, looks like that number's remained the same in 6.4 in spite of 4 splits and 3 lumps. Is that the case?

thanks,

Larry
 
Hi Keith, I had 10,649 extant spp for version 6.3, looks like that number's remained the same in 6.4 in spite of 4 splits and 3 lumps. Is that the case?

The front page of the website now states 10659 extant spp and 155 extinct spp (which total 10814). The spreadsheet for 6.3 has 10814 spp, and that for 6.4 has 10815. The increase by one on the spreadsheets is consistent with the 4 splits and 3 lumps. Perhaps the front page has not been updated (should read 10660 extant spp)?

Keith
 
The front page of the website now states 10659 extant spp and 155 extinct spp (which total 10814). The spreadsheet for 6.3 has 10814 spp, and that for 6.4 has 10815. The increase by one on the spreadsheets is consistent with the 4 splits and 3 lumps. Perhaps the front page has not been updated (should read 10660 extant spp)?

Keith

Fixed
Thanks
f
 
Hi Frank,
while you're here I came across a "dead-spot" in the IOC list (other lists as well probably)

Common Bush-Tanager is supposed (per Birds of Belize) to occur commonly in one location in Belize (the highest mountain), but none of the subspecies ranges in the IOC list include Belize.

This will become pertinent if you ever split the middle American taxa as recommended elsewhere.

I would assume dwighti would be the likely candidate but I'm not the man to figure it out!!

cheers,
James
 
Warning! This thread is more than 8 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top