• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Where premium quality meets exceptional value. ZEISS Conquest HDX.

ID help needed-fastidious replies only please (1 Viewer)

Quite understandible Th_SQ's agony over the Redpoll here. I have gone through the images and also had difficulties to see that they all where of the same bird. In a PM to Jane I mentioned that the only pic. I was pretty sure of being an Arctic was this one:

http://www.vividpix.com/images/pages_r2_c1.jpg

Being aware of the difficulties to separate many Redpoll/Arctic, especially 1cy birds, I think that the shape of the undertail streaks is acceptable for exilipes and the rump patch, which is broad enough, with a hint of pinkish and vaguely streaked is acceptable for a 2cy male. A problem (?) would be the bill size and it´s quite fascinating to see in the vividpix link how the impression of bill size changes in pic. 2 to pic.5 as also can be seen here, first and second pic. (same bird)

http://www.sofnet.org/index.asp?lev=1804&typ=1

(1k hanne = 1cy male, 1k hona = 1cy female)

Further on bills, check these flammea bills and notise besides size the slightly curve near the tip, which also exceed the tip of lower mandible in many:

http://web.telia.com/~u15702529/faltbestamning/nabben/mer_grasisknabbar.htm

and look at the second exilipes at the bottom of this page:

http://web.telia.com/~u15702529/faltbestamning/nabben/siskornas_nabbar.htm

and this one from December:

http://www.uof.nu/Galleri/images/Galleri1_0409-12/snosiska1_FL.jpg

2cy exilipes Nov.

http://www.bingsmarken.se/Bilder/snsis_sta_bo.jpg

According to tailfeathers of 1cy which are pointed, but occasionally can be renewed in some, from a few up to all.

JanJ
 
Warning! This thread is more than 18 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top