• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Where premium quality meets exceptional value. ZEISS Conquest HDX.

Falcon sp. Masai Mara, Kenya. Nov 22 (1 Viewer)

stuartelsom

Well-known member
United Kingdom
I would be very grateful of your opinions regarding this bird which until editing the pics just a moment ago I had completely forgotten about. This is heavily cropped, it was always distant, and not seen to fly so not a particularly helpful set of circumstances, could this be an Amur Falcon?

Thanks very much

Stu
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2023-03-27 at 23.47.46.png
    Screenshot 2023-03-27 at 23.47.46.png
    242.4 KB · Views: 125
Hi Stu, tricky image, but given the unbarred tail and inconspicuous (dark and not obvious) eye ring, I couldn't rule out Hobby from this single image. Hope this helps and you get some more (informed) opinions!
 
I can think of 5 species that are in the frame based just on that view. It does seem to have very long wings, which might knock some out - though that does depend on posture.
 
I was not able to find a single photography of a juvenile African Hobby. I think the unbarred central tail feathers leaves us with the Hobbies
 
I think the unbarred central tail feathers leaves us with the Hobbies
...and sooty falcon and (given the photo-quality and the fact that they can have tail only weakly barred) Amur falcon.
 
...and sooty falcon and (given the photo-quality and the fact that they can have tail only weakly barred) Amur falcon.
What makes ...881 amur falcon? Looks more like hobby. We can't see the legs etc to be sure, but cere is yellow (compare 241)

Edit: the checklist has other photos. In one we can see the legs are yellow so 881 is a misidentified Eurasian hobby. I'll flag it...
 
Last edited:
Warning! This thread is more than 2 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top