• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Where premium quality meets exceptional value. ZEISS Conquest HDX.

Enough here to call this a LR Plover - UK inland former quarry Lake ? (1 Viewer)

498 Ramblin Alex

Active member
England
Also I was using Merlin live sound recording and it picked up the Little Ringed Plover. Is this very reliable?

Alex
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20220703-093000_Gallery.jpg
    Screenshot_20220703-093000_Gallery.jpg
    346.5 KB · Views: 68
  • 1320076.jpg
    1320076.jpg
    9.6 MB · Views: 72
Hello Alex,

I dont know, how reliable the Merlin app is, and I agree with Butty, there are several wrongly identified cases here on BF. But as it identified the call as a Little RP, I agree with you that its ok to use the answer as a feature.

I must admit, that my first gut-feeling was a Common RP too, I agree with JWN, Dave, Jogresh, Butty and Clark. 2cy birds can have a dark bill and I am not sure, an orange bill-base would be visible here, the picture seems slightly colourless to me (no offence you know).

Assuming, that a Little RP isnt a massive rarity (can you give exact location please?) and bearing AI in mind, I struggled to find a pro Little RP feature. And a hard biased look revealed what can be interpreteted as a smallish black/dark mask with the right corner (not rounded) at the lower border. Yes its easy and true, that this is wishful thinking next level. Yes, I try to defeat Merlin here (personal reason, no offence)....
 
Thank you everyone the search for a LRP goes on for me! I have seen RPs in the same location. North North Yorkshire. A better viee will come.

Of course the quality is bad, the good pictures go in the photogenic section!

Alex.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 3 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top