Adam W
Well-known member
Sorry, I just couldn't read anymore of the thread after that.....:-O
:-O I resisted the temptation to make the same comment through risk of being accused of being childish but its good to know it wasnt just me.
Sorry, I just couldn't read anymore of the thread after that.....:-O
:-O I resisted the temptation to make the same comment through risk of being accused of being childish but its good to know it wasnt just me.
Sorry, I just couldn't read anymore of the thread after that.....:-O
If I was a buzzard faced with this would I go and look for the old, sick and non-productive birds...
Providing cover in the pens can reduce the number lost dramatically
Have you ever seen newly released poults? They have no chance against raptors, as Apodemus states, it is something of a feeding frenzy.
If you are worried about new poults being taken by wild predators then protect them by spending some money on a chicken wire roof.
Hi
I think you misread my post.
Dunno personally, although I suppose to a large shoot releasing 40,000 birds 5% = 2,000 birds with a commercial value of say £30+ each, £60k might be perceived to be a significant loss.
As the link I provided earlier suggests - less then 5% of losses are due to raptors, |^|
The averge according to the link is 1-2% - you maths is a bit wonky too given that you assume all the birds released will stay in the estate and/or be shot in a particular season!!
PS: Do you beleive that a handfull of large shoots should decide conservation policy in the UK to the extent that be allowed blow away any raptor who happens to be in the area?? - if the answer is yes then I assume you would also support the activities of the mafia behind the illegal trade in Rhino Horn and Tiger bones given that potential profits are being compremised for some by the protection of these species!!|^|
Nothing wrong with my maths, you quoted the "less than 5%" figure so I used 5%, perhaps you should have stated less than 2%....but then you appear to have the over-zealous exaggeration approach we so often see in these debates.
Really - its your type that appear to view raptors as the source of all evil in the world:-O
- but I guess some people just don't like facts/science and want to live in some sort of Victorian dark age instead|8||
Trust me, I am more aware then you with regard to the quarry base of raptors
I also prefer to deal with facts therefore perhaps you could kindly point out which of my posts, or part thereof, reflect a hatred for raptors....if you cannot then perhaps that might confirm an over-zealous,blinkered viewpoint on your part.
Thanks in advance....I'm sure I will have rather a long wait though......
Maybe you do, but your postings so far in this thread would suggest otherwise:smoke:
I'm sorry Firecrest but you do seem to jump to unfounded conclusions about other people's experience.
Oh dear, my fault I got myself involved! I really don't want to dent anybody at all. I just cannot tolerate any suggestion that hunting interests can come before raptor conservation and some of what I have read could maybe interpreted as being pro raptor control. .