• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Where premium quality meets exceptional value. ZEISS Conquest HDX.

Cormorants or Shags (1 Viewer)

sooseee

Well-known member
Was at Teignmouth at w/e- the sea was pretty rough and at different times and all within approx 20yds watched the above diving into the crests of waves, mostly, and skimming the tops of waves at times and returning to bob and dive again.I couldn't seee the head shape well enough and am not yet very experienced in id. If anyone has any ideas would be grateful.
Thanks , Sue.
 
it 's very diffucult id this bird with a description of the behaviour without any shape details, but at last I think it cuold be a cormorant.

Umberto
 
You're description of the dive sounds more like a Shag. This is because they tend to jump clear of the water when they dive, whereas a Cormorant would 'slip' into the water without too much of a splash (similar to a Diver).

Having said that however, its just as likely to be a Cormorant, maybe even more so as they are much commoner.
 
Sean F said:
Having said that however, its just as likely to be a Cormorant, maybe even more so as they are much commoner.

Actually this is a popular misconception, occasioned presumably by Cormorants being more likely to be where people are. In particular Cormorants are very visible at reservoirs and lakes inland, and are found in the south-east where most people live. But actually Shags are much more numerous, just more pelagic and tending to be found west and north. And Devon and Cornwall are English strongholds.

RSPB site stats are:
(Great) Cormorant, Phalacrocorax carbo
UK breeding: 7,600 pairs
UK wintering: 16,000 birds

Shag, Phalacrocorax aristotelis
UK breeding: 46,000 pairs
UK wintering: 100-150,000 birds

In Teignmouth, in the sea, Shag is more likely and the bahviour slightly suggests that but frankly it is impossible to call with any certainty.

Graham
 
bitterntwisted said:
RSPB site stats are:
(Great) Cormorant, Phalacrocorax carbo
UK breeding: 7,600 pairs
UK wintering: 16,000 birds

Shag, Phalacrocorax aristotelis
UK breeding: 46,000 pairs
UK wintering: 100-150,000 birds


Graham

When you look at the figures it's staggering (shaggering) that there are so few cormorants, as they seem to be everywhere now, inland at least.
 
scary-canary said:
When you look at the figures it's staggering (shaggering) that there are so few cormorants, as they seem to be everywhere now, inland at least.

Yeah, it's weird isn't it. I guess they are big and visible and they are possibly mostly inland because they can eat so readily at fishing lakes. But it is very surprising how few there actually are of many "common" birds. There are more people at a Luton home game than there are Great Crested Grebes in Britain in Winter? But there are up to 100,000 breeding pairs of Leach's Petrel! It's all about habitat, habits, distribution and visibility, not just numbers.
 
Thanks everyone-amazed by RSPB stats-I'm one who always thought cormorants more common. Wish I could give a better shape description- maybe new bins for Christmas!
 
Cormorants are more widespread than Shags in the UK.
Shags are more numerous than Cormorants in the UK.
In depends what criteria you use as to which is the more common.
 
scary-canary said:
When you look at the figures it's staggering (shaggering) that there are so few cormorants, as they seem to be everywhere now, inland at least.

I don't believe those stats.

OTOH, I've just (since writing the first line of this post( looked up Wiki, and find that according to that 3% of the Brit breeding population of cormorants is about 2 miles away from where I live, so that might explain why I see a lot more cormorants than shags.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St_Margaret's_Island

David
 
David Bl said:
I don't believe those stats.

OTOH, I've just (since writing the first line of this post( looked up Wiki, and find that according to that 3% of the Brit breeding population of cormorants is about 2 miles away from where I live, so that might explain why I see a lot more cormorants than shags.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St_Margaret's_Island

David

At Dawlish Warren a couple of weeks ago (just along the coast from Teignmouth), all the 'black seabirds' were Cormorants.
However, I agree, telling the difference at long range takes much practice!
 
Its funny really. Shags are quite scarce down here in The Wash, but where i've lived previously on Shetland and in Devon, i've had loads of shags.

Luck of the draw i guess....
 
Frenchy said:
Its funny really. Shags are quite scarce down here in The Wash, but where i've lived previously on Shetland and in Devon, i've had loads of shags.

Luck of the draw i guess....

It's probably just that you're getting a bit past it nowadays.
 
Andrew Whitehouse said:
It's probably just that you're getting a bit past it nowadays.
:'D :'D My fingers have been hovering over the keyboard, but I didn't have the bottle to do it.
Fancy having a bird called a shag! Oops I've gone and done it myself!
 
3:)

I know its childish, but its a Friday, and i couldn't resist!!

Its lucky i didn't mention Great Tits and vagrant boobies.....
 
As soon as I as I saw this thread I wondered how long it would take before someone would lower the tone!


Andrew Whitehouse said:
It's probably just that you're getting a bit past it nowadays.

Thanks Andrew! :gn:


Incidently, I remember reading somewhere that Shag were in fact commoner (in terms of numbers) in Britain than Cormorant, I was just testing. (o)<
 
Finally think I've answered my own question! Up on estuary between Bideford and Instow this pm-was able to watch cormorants . Larger than last weeks birds at Teignmouth , different head shape. Won't make any comments about scarcity of shags in North Devon etc and carry on like Frenchy and co....
 
Warning! This thread is more than 19 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top