It's a Google sheet, so it's not easy (for me) to know when it was actually last updated.I reckon the spreadsheet linked in the first post is a bit outdated, dated in June.
Mine, too, although I can't be sure I didn't enter it that way.However the eBird system has reclassified some of my British Willow Ptarmigan sightings as "Willow Ptarmigan (Red Grouse)" so it looks like the split is happening in real life.
The 2024 sheet hasn't changed since june (data yield the same checksum).It's a Google sheet, so it's not easy (for me) to know when it was actually last updated.
However the eBird system has reclassified some of my British Willow Ptarmigan sightings as "Willow Ptarmigan (Red Grouse)" so it looks like the split is happening in real life.
No checklist yet though…Happy Ebird Taxonomy Update Day!
2024 Taxonomy Update—COMPLETE - eBird
The 2024 eBird Taxonomy Update will begin on 22 October. Big changes are already underway to Herring Gulls, House Wrens, and more as we prepare the eBird database for this year's revisions.ebird.org
No; it looks like I actually uploaded them under that name.However the eBird system has reclassified some of my British Willow Ptarmigan sightings as "Willow Ptarmigan (Red Grouse)" so it looks like the split is happening in real life.
It's not possible to download whole checklists from Avibase (at least, I am not able to). I wonder, is that oversight, or left out deliberately? Will such a lack of download also be a feature/fault of the WGAC site? Of course nobody knows, and many people won't care as long as data is presented well in the browser.Denis Lepage of Avibase was mentioned as the person who would be running the database during the WGAC process. And you can already see that Avibase includes some WGAC version names in the list of names for species (along with Clements, IOC and other checklist version). I suspect Avibase was always going to be the back engine of the website, whether hosted on Avibase or at a new domain name.
Thanks! (Time to update Scythebill.)
They removed the "authority " from the names in all these files. Weird.
Please don't change any of your observations until after the process is done, it can really mess stuff up. It will all be explained when the process is done.Various changes have appeared on my list on eBird - American Herring Gull appeared and Redpolls consolidated. Clearly a work in progress.
One change puzzles me. The majority of white-eyes that I identified in Uganda and Rwanda were Green White-eye. However, some in drier habitats away from the core Rift Valley, I recorded as Northern Yellow White-eye.
These have been mysteriously reclassified as Green White-eye. I changed them back and they have been reclassified again.
Does anything know anything about this?
Many thanks
Paul
I am not sure how the reclassification of some Northern Yellow White-eyes should turn some into Green White-eyes unless they have written the change programme to reclassify some in some areas not simply as part of the Northern Yellow White-eye split but as a reclassification to Green White-eye.
Be interested to understand this. Always happy to learn if I have made identification mistakes. It happens...
All the best
Paul
EBird explicitly asks that you wait for the updates to finish to go back in and question/revise/etc. Things can appear wrong temporarily at times.
In past taxonomy updates many of observations have appeared obviously incorrect for brief periods. They were always fixed eventually. You just have to be patient.Hopefully. At the moment the deliberate identifications (whether correct or erroneous) have been subsumed in nearly 20 Green White-eye sightings so are now impossible to identify. Temporarily would be good.
This seems the equivalent of some Red-rumped Swallow sightings appearing as House Martin during transition to Asian or African? But I'll wait. The difficulty is not having an audit trail & then scrabbling around trying to work out why or where things have changed which is similar to the adventive lottery. 😀
All the best
Paul
In past taxonomy updates many of observations have appeared obviously incorrect for brief periods. They were always fixed eventually. You just have to patient.
Actually, the Red Grouse still remains unsplit in the final version! A bit weird, but I guess they'll reconcile that later on.I just downloaded that spreadsheet and went through it in considerable detail. There's a lot of changes there, as there usually are. But the Willow Ptarmigan/Red Grouse split is conspicuously missing. The comment text suggests it is meant to happen, but there's only one lumped species in the spreadsheet as of yesterday.