• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Where premium quality meets exceptional value. ZEISS Conquest HDX.

Caprimulgiformes (4 Viewers)

I would think the latter, why you don't want to lump songbirds together, would be obvious: A family with 870 species is huge and unwieldy, as you would get with the 9-primaried oscines.

Folks, to propose that all species, genera or families should be of the same size or the same age implies that natural selection in different conditions would proceed at the same speed. It is unscientific.
 
Folks, to propose that all species, genera or families should be of the same size or the same age implies that natural selection in different conditions would proceed at the same speed. It is unscientific.
But there must be some consistency within families because the fact that genera diverge at approximately the same time indicates that there was an event that produced diversification at a regular rhythm. When I see that the genus Lamprotornis is older than related multigeneric clades, I tell myself that there is a serious problem of taxonomic balance (although I see the same case in other families like Furnariidae).
 
I am not sure I understood what exactly you mean. However, bird phylogeny showed no times when lineages diverged more and diverged less. Which broadly proves that the concept of discrete ranks across lineages like genus, family, order etc. is arbitrary.
 
I am not sure I understood what exactly you mean. However, bird phylogeny showed no times when lineages diverged more and diverged less. Which broadly proves that the concept of discrete ranks across lineages like genus, family, order etc. is arbitrary.
When I see the phylogeny of Muscicapidae, I notice that the average divergence time is around 10 mya, which gives a certain balance, as if the lineages evolved at a more or less regular pace.
 
Laurent can you explain the index for Scortornis in Swainson July 1837.
Scortornis, Sw:., generic character, 331. Subgeneric character and
species, 339. I do not see anything about Scortornis on p. 331
Presumably 331 is simply a typo for 339.

I agree.
On p. 339, SCORTORNIS Sw. (small caps) is a genus, which includes subgenera Scortornis Sw., Macrodypteryx Sw. and Proïthera Sw. (italics).
Swainson gives characters associated to both ranks.
 
Costa TVV, Els PV, Braun MJ, Whitney BM, Cleere N, Sigurdsson S, Silveira LF. Systematic revision and generic classification of a clade of New World nightjars (Aves: Caprimulgidae). Avian Systematics, aceito.


How to say "trépigner d'impatience" in English?
 
Costa TVV, Els PV, Braun MJ, Whitney BM, Cleere N, Sigurdsson S, Silveira LF. Systematic revision and generic classification of a clade of New World nightjars (Aves: Caprimulgidae). Avian Systematics, aceito.


How to say "trépigner d'impatience" in English?
"Chomping at the bit" is a bit to literal; how about "I'm in jolted anticipation!"

(It's much easier to translate it into Dutch, which uses the same expression – and describes how I feel about this one, haha!)
 
A couple of technicalities...

Nyctiprogne Bonaparte, 1857
Riv. Contemp. Turin, 9, p. 215.
Type species, by monotypy, Caprimulgus leucopygus von Spix, 1825, currently Nyctiprogne leucopyga (von Spix, 1825).
Originally included nominal species : Nyctiprogne leucopygius [sic] = Caprimulgus leucopygus Spix 1825 (syn. minutus = Chordeiles minutus Bonaparte 1850).
Type, by monotypy : Caprimulgus leucopygus Spix 1825, indeed.


Lurocalis Cassin, 1851
Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 5, p. 189.
Type species, by subsequent designation (G.R. Gray, 1855, p. 12.), Caprimulgus nattererii Temminck, 1822, currently Lurocalis semitorquatus nattererii (Temminck, 1822).
Originally included nominal species : Lurocalis nattererii = Caprimulgus nattereri Temminck 1822, L. semitorquatus = Caprimulgus semitorquatus Gmelin 1789.
Type, by subsequent designation (Hartlaub 1852 : Jahrg.18:Bd.2 (1852) - Archiv für Naturgeschichte - Biodiversity Heritage Library ) : Caprimulgus semitorquatus Gmelin 1789.
(Hartlaub 1852 was before Gray 1855 : Gray's designation has no standing.)


Nyctipolus Ridgway, 1912
Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash., 25, p. 98.
Type species, by original designation, Caprimulgus nigrescens Cabanis, 1849, currently Nyctipolus nigrescens (Cabanis, 1849).
Originally included nominal species : Nyctipolus nigrescens = Caprimulgus nigrescens Cabanis 1848, N. whitleyi = Anthrostomus whitelyi Salvin 1885.
Type, by original designation Caprimulgus nigrescens Cabanis 1848, indeed.


Nyctidromus Gould, 1838
Icon. Av., Pt. 2, pl. [12], text.
Type species, by monotypy, Nyctidromus derbyanus Gould, 1838, currently Nyctidromus albicollis derbyanus Gould, 1838.
Originally included nominal species : Nyctidromus derbyanus Gould 1838.
Type, by monotypy : Nyctidromus derbyanus Gould 1838, indeed.


Setopagis Ridgway, 1912
Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash., 25, p. 98.
Type species, by original designation and monotypy, Caprimulgus parvulus Gould, 1837, currently Setopagis parvula (Gould, 1837).
Originally included nominal species : Setopagis parvulus = Caprimulgus parvulus Gould 1837
Type, by original designation : Caprimulgus parvulus Gould 1837.
(Original designation and monotypy are wholly distinct methods of type fixation which can produce conflicting results; there is absolutely no way that a type species could ever be fixed by both methods ["original designation and monotypy"] at the same time. The presence of a type designation precludes a fixation by monotypy; see ICZN 68.)


Tepuiornis Costa, van Els, Braun, Whitney, Cleere, Sigurðsson & Silveira gen. nov.
[...]
Type species, by original designation and monotypy: Antrostomus whitelyi Salvin, 1885.
https://www.aviansystematics.org/uploads/texteditor/AS_1_6_PDFA.pdf
Originally included nominal species : Tepuiornis whitelyi = Antrostomus whitelyi Salvin 1885.
Type, by original designation : Antrostomus whitelyi Salvin 1885.
(See above. The presence of a type designation precludes a fixation by monotypy.)


Systellura Ridgway, 1912
Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash., 25, p. 97.
Type species, by original designation and monotypy, Stenopsis ruficervix P.L. Sclater, 1866, currently Systellura longirostris ruficervix (P.L. Sclater, 1866)
Originally included nominal species : Systellura ruficervix = Stenopsis ruficervix Sclater 1866.
Type, by original designation : Stenopsis ruficervix Sclater 1866.
(See above. The presence of a type designation precludes a fixation by monotypy.)


Quechuavis van Els, Costa, Braun, Whitney, Cleere, Sigurðsson & Silveira gen. nov.
[...]
Type species, by original designation and monotypy: Caprimulgus decussatus von Tschudi, 1844.
https://www.aviansystematics.org/uploads/texteditor/AS_1_6_PDFA.pdf
Originally included nominal species : Quechuavis decussata = Caprimulgus decussatus Tschudi 1844.
Type, by original designation : Caprimulgus decussatus Tschudi 1844.
(See above. The presence of a type designation precludes a fixation by monotypy.)


Eleothreptus G.R. Gray, 1840
List Gen. Birds, p. 7.
Type species, by original designation and monotypy, Amblypterus anomalus Gould, 1838, currently Eleothreptus anomalus (Gould, 1838). Eleothreptus G.R. Gray, 1840 was published as a nomen novum for Amblypterus Gould, 1838, a junior homonym of Amblypterus Agassiz, 1833.
Originally included nominal species : Eleothreptus anomalus = Amblypterus anomalus Gould 1838.
New name for Amblypterus Gould 1838, deemed preoccupied in entomology (presumably by Amblyptera Solier 1836, Coleoptera); actually preoccupied by Amblypterus Agassiz 1833 (Pisces).
Type inherited from Amblypterus Gould 1838. (See ICZN 67.8; Gray's own designation has no standing whatsoever, it would have to be disregarded if it conflicted with the type fixation of the original name.)

Amblypterus Gould 1838 :
Originally included nominal species : Amblypterus anomalus Gould 1838.
Type, by monotypy : Amblypterus anomalus Gould 1838.


Uropsalis W. deW. Miller, 1915
Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 34, p. 516.
Type species, by original designation, Hydropsalis lyra Bonaparte, 1850, currently Uropsalis lyra (Bonaparte, 1850).
Originally included nominal species: Uropsalis lyra = Hydropsalis lyra Bonaparte 1850, U. segmentata = Hydropsalis segmentatus Cassin 1849.
Type, by original designation : Hydropsalis lyra Bonaparte 1850, indeed.
.

Antiurus Ridgway, 1912
Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash., 25, p. 98.
Type species, by original designation and monotypy, Stenopsis maculicaudus Lawrence, 1862, currently Hydropsalis maculicaudus (Lawrence, 1862).
Originally included nominal species : Antiurus maculicaudus = Stenopsis maculicaudus Lawrence 1862.
Type, by original designation : Stenopsis maculicaudus Lawrence, 1862.
(See above. The presence of a type designation precludes a fixation by monotypy.)


Macropsalis P.L. Sclater, 1866
Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 34, p. 143.
Type species, by subsequent designation (E. Hartert, 1892, p. 601.), Caprimulgus forcipatus Nitzsch, 1840, currently Macropsalis forcipata (Nitzsch, 1840).
Originally included nominal species : Hydropsalis forcipata = Caprimulgus forcipatus Nitzsch 1840 (syn. H. limbatus Cassin 1849, "Caprimulgus megalurus, Licht. MS."), H. ypanemae Pelzeln 1865, H. lyra Bonaparte 1850, H. segmentata (= 'segmentatus') Cassin 1849.
Type, by subsequent designation (either Sundevall 1872 : Methodi naturalis avium disponendarum tentamen - Biodiversity Heritage Library [quite clearly intended as a type designation but usually unaccepted], or Hartert 1892 : Vol 16 (1892) - Catalogue of the Birds in the British Museum - Biodiversity Heritage Library ) : Hydropsalis forcipata Nitzsch 1840.


Thermochalcis Richmond, 1915
Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash., 28, p. 98.
Type species, by original designation and monotypy, Stenopsis cayennensis J.F. Gmelin, 1789, currently Hydropsalis cayennensis (J.F. Gmelin, 1789).
Originally included nominal species : Caprimulgus cayennensis Gmelin 1789.
New name for Stenopsis Cassin 1851, preoccupied by Stenopsis Rafinesque 1815 (Coleoptera -- a new name for Akis 'Fabricius' = Herbst 1799).
Type inherited from Stenopsis Cassin 1851. (See ICZN 67.8; Richmond's own designation has no standing whatsoever, it would have to be disregarded if it conflicted with the type fixation of the original name.)
(Of course, Gmelin 1789 did not describe a species in the genus Stenopsis Cassin 1851.)

Stenopsis Cassin 1851 :
Originally included nominal species : Stenopsis cayennensis = Caprimulgus cayennensis Gmelin 1789 (syn. Caprimulgus leucurus Vieillot 1817, C. cayanus Latham 1890, C. leopetes Jardine & Selby 1830, C. odontopteron Lesson 1839); S. longirostris = C. longirostris Bonaparte 1825 (syn. C. bifasciatus Gould 1837, C. decussatus Tschudi 1844), S. parvulus = C. parvulus Gould 1837 (syn. C. 'aequicaudatus' = C. aequicauda Peale 1848, C. conterminus Peale 1848), S. nigrescens = C. nigrescens Cabanis 1848, [S. hirundinaceus = C. hirundinaceus Spix 1825 -- inclusion conditional].
Type, by subsequent designation (Hartlaub 1852 : Jahrg.18:Bd.2 (1852) - Archiv für Naturgeschichte - Biodiversity Heritage Library ) : Caprumulgus 'cajennensis' = C. cayennensis Gmelin 1789.


Hydropsalis Wagler, 1832
Isis von Oken, 25, col. 1222.
Type species, by subsequent designation (G.R. Gray, 1855, p. 11.), Caprimulgus furcifer Vieillot, 1817, currently Hydropsalis torquata furcifer (Vieillot, 1817).
Originally included nominal species : Hydropsalis azarae Wagler 1832 (syn. Caprimulgus furcifer Vieillot 1817, C. psalurus Temminck 1822), H. manurus = Caprimulgus manurus Vieillot 1817.
Type, by subsequent designation (Gray 1840 : A list of the genera of birds - Biodiversity Heritage Library ) : Caprimulgus furcifer Vieillot 1817.
(Gray 1840 was before Gray 1855; only the first designation has standing. Gray misspelled the name 'Hydropsalia' in 1840; this does not affect the validity of the designation. Anyway, Gray designated the same type while spelling the name correctly in 1841 [A list of the genera of birds - Biodiversity Heritage Library ], hence, even if the misspelling had made the 1840 designation invalid, the 1855 designation would definitely still be lacking standing.)
 
Last edited:
Jiminy Cricket Laurent that’s a tremendous amount of work! I had never seen Rivista contemporanea before.
“the genus comprises three lineages probably best considered separate species, the nomenclature of which is remarkably complicated. This case is under study and will be resolved in the near future...”
In 1850 Bonaparte published as a new species Caprimulgus minutus, At the end of description he states “Vix hujus generis!” Hardly of this kind! On that page is (leucopygius Spix) in brackets.
t.1 (1850) - Conspectus generum avium - Biodiversity Heritage Library .
In 1854 Bonaparte creates a new genus Nyctiprogne but it is lacking the genus species.
ser.4:t.1 (1854) - Annales des sciences naturelles - Biodiversity Heritage Library .
Could N. minutus be reused for one of the three lineages? There must be a Natterer skin in Vienna?
I spoke too late: Recognize minuta Bonaparte as the second species in the genus Nyctiprogne .
Other options:

Nyctiprogne latifascia Friedmann 1945
Nyctiprogne leucopyga exigua Friedmann, 1945
Nyctiprogne leucopyga majuscula Pinto & Camargo, 1952
Nyctiprogne leucopyga pallida Phelps y Phelps 1952
Nyctiprogne vielliardi .
(There is no Natterer skin of minutus in Vienna but possibly in Naturalis Biodiversity Center.) . Type specimens of non-passerines in Naturalis Biodiversity Center (Animalia, Aves) .
 
Last edited:
King, B.F., Sangster, G., Trainor, C.R., Irestedt, M., Prawiradilaga, D.M. and Ericson, P.G.P. (2024), A new species of nightjar (Caprimulgus) from Timor and Wetar, Lesser Sunda Islands, Wallacea. Ibis. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/ibi.13340

Abstract
The nightjars of the Caprimulgus macrurus complex are distributed from Pakistan to Australia and comprise six morphologically similar but vocally distinct species. Fieldwork on Timor and Wetar, Lesser Sunda Islands, has resulted in the discovery of a seventh species in the complex, which we describe as a new species. This species has previously been confused with Caprimulgus macrurus, Caprimulgus celebensis and Caprimulgus manillensis but it differs from these and all other species in the complex by at least 13 vocal characters. Discriminant function analysis correctly classified all recordings in the complex to species. Caprimulgus ritae is known from five adult museum specimens, which are the smallest in the complex and which differ from other species in the complex in several morphological characters. A molecular phylogenetic analysis indicated that C. ritae is sister to C. meesi from Flores and Sumba, and that these species together are sister to C. macrurus. C. ritae is a tropical forest specialist occurring from sea level to at least 1500 m (probably mostly below 1000 m). Lowland and montane forests on Timor are threatened. Wetar is one of the least developed islands in Indonesia, and retains >95% natural vegetation, dominated by Eucalyptus woodlands, with tropical forests in river gorges and slopes in upland areas. Pressure for development is accelerating throughout the range of C. ritae, and a detailed assessment of its conservation status is urgently needed.

Caprimulgus ritae new species.

I was aware of this new species name since many month 😅
 
Last edited:
King, B.F., Sangster, G., Trainor, C.R., Irestedt, M., Prawiradilaga, D.M. and Ericson, P.G.P. (2024), A new species of nightjar (Caprimulgus) from Timor and Wetar, Lesser Sunda Islands, Wallacea. Ibis. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/ibi.13340

Abstract
The nightjars of the Caprimulgus macrurus complex are distributed from Pakistan to Australia and comprise six morphologically similar but vocally distinct species. Fieldwork on Timor and Wetar, Lesser Sunda Islands, has resulted in the discovery of a seventh species in the complex, which we describe as a new species. This species has previously been confused with Caprimulgus macrurus, Caprimulgus celebensis and Caprimulgus manillensis but it differs from these and all other species in the complex by at least 13 vocal characters. Discriminant function analysis correctly classified all recordings in the complex to species. Caprimulgus ritae is known from five adult museum specimens, which are the smallest in the complex and which differ from other species in the complex in several morphological characters. A molecular phylogenetic analysis indicated that C. ritae is sister to C. meesi from Flores and Sumba, and that these species together are sister to C. macrurus. C. ritae is a tropical forest specialist occurring from sea level to at least 1500 m (probably mostly below 1000 m). Lowland and montane forests on Timor are threatened. Wetar is one of the least developed islands in Indonesia, and retains >95% natural vegetation, dominated by Eucalyptus woodlands, with tropical forests in river gorges and slopes in upland areas. Pressure for development is accelerating throughout the range of C. ritae, and a detailed assessment of its conservation status is urgently needed.

Caprimulgus ritae new species.

I was aware of this new species since many month 😅
I was going through the TIF excel spreadsheet checklist (most recent update apparently 2019), and noticed in the list a undescribed nightjar from Timor, so I guess that is this taxon?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top