The BulbMogul
Well-known member
Anyone yet here use the above combo..?
What prices do they sell at? How many here can afford the more expensive of these?I am quite surprised that no one yet has stepped forward to share their R3 experience's..? You see tons pertaining to the R7 but nothing yet on R3...
Maybe nobody who comes here has one. They are over 4 times the price of the R7, with only half the pixels of the R5 and three-quarters the pixels of an R7, so obviously less in demand numerically for birds.I am quite surprised that no one yet has stepped forward to share their R3 experience's..? You see tons pertaining to the R7 but nothing yet on R3...
So what your telling me is that the R3 is useless for "BIRDS" even if I never said a word about birds right..? Less in demand says who..? And I bet the new RF800 is also 1/2 the pixels too right..?Maybe nobody who comes here has one. They are over 4 times the price of the R7, with only half the pixels of the R5 and three-quarters the pixels of an R7, so obviously less in demand numerically for birds.
Sonebody is surely buying them just like the Nikon Z9... !What prices do they sell at? How many here can afford the more expensive of these?
Niels
I'm saying precisely what I wrote, no more, no less. If you choose to put your own interpretations on that for your own ends, that's up to you. How are you getting on with your own R3? Troll away. I'll not be replying.So what your telling me is that the R3 is useless for "BIRDS" even if I never said a word about birds right..? Less in demand says who..? And I bet the new RF800 is also 1/2 the pixels too right..?
Bafty, The R3 was the way to go with me as well was the Canon RF800MM F/5.6 Lens. I agree with all the compromises the lower end ones present and stuck with the Canon Flagships just like I do with my Nikon Flagships... Here is both the new Nikon Z9 as well as the Canon R3 ready for some clicking snaps of the SriLankan rain forrest again this fall..Personally I think the R3 has merits for bird photograph, I know there's a few on this forum that have used the 1DX2 so the natural progression. R3 has better AF over the R5, better buffer as you would expect, cost wise you can pick one up from Panomoz for around £4900 and thats where I'll be heading next. R7 offers nothing than I'm interest in as it's too compromised.
Here is both the new Nikon Z9 as well as the Canon R3 ready for some clicking snaps of the SriLankan rain forrest again this fall..
Jeez. Strap on camera not big lens? Bad idea. No photographer would risk that!Bafty, The R3 was the way to go with me as well was the Canon RF800MM F/5.6 Lens. I agree with all the compromises the lower end ones present and stuck with the Canon Flagships just like I do with my Nikon Flagships... Here is both the new Nikon Z9 as well as the Canon R3 ready for some clicking snaps of the SriLankan rain forrest again this fall..View attachment 1458977
quite honestly you have no clue on how I actually carry my rigs around or you would not have answered so foolish..Jeez. Strap on camera not big lens? Bad idea. No photographer would risk that!
John
Your own photos aren't evidence of your practise? Not much point to posting them, then.quite honestly you have no clue on how I actually carry my rigs around or you would not have answered so foolish..![]()
PLEASE SHOW me a picture of me CARRYING the Camera & Long lens by a CAMERA STRAP..? What the heck does my pictures show besides a camera strap affixed to the Camera BODY..? You have not seen not a single bit of evidence that I carry around a $25,000.00 KIT by the strap on the camera.... Yes these are my photos and lots of my equipment...Your own photos aren't evidence of your practise? Not much point to posting them, then.
John