• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Where premium quality meets exceptional value. ZEISS Conquest HDX.

Calliste tanagnathus Eyton, 1856' (1 Viewer)

James Jobling

Well-known member
England
Calliste tanagnathus Eyton, 1856. I have unearthed this specific name in Eyton, 1856, Cat. Species of Birds in his Possession, p. 277 (two examples, one from Demerara/Guyana, the other from Guatemala). I assume it is a synonym for one of the tanagers, but, despite checking the usual Neotropical references, have yet to find it. Originally I was drawn towards Lampropsar tanagrinus, an icterid, but that does not occur in Guatemala. Can any reader help with identifying / defining Eyton’s name?
 
(two examples, one from Demerara/Guyana, the other from Guatemala).

This won't answer the main question, I'm afraid, but -- is this really how we are supposed to read it ?


My inclination would be to understand the Demerara bird only as included in 'Calliste Tanagnathus', and the Guatemalan bird as being left unidentified.

(In my reading, the blank space separating the data pertaining to the two specimens is a line where the name of the second bird should in principle have appeared, but which was left empty. Note that, elsewhere in the list, Eyton regularly listed multiple specimens, sometimes with multiple localities associated to them, in a single entry -- e.g., if you scroll down to the next page, under Nemosia gularis, you will see 5 specimens from 3 localities.)
 
Last edited:
Laurent, I appreciate your observation. As our late lamented Queen said, “Recollections may vary.” My take is still that the entry for Calliste tanagnathus refers to two consecutively numbered specimens (e.g., as per the listings of Calliste labradoroides (pp. 277-278,) and Nemosia guira (p. 279.)) I shall insert tanagnathus in The Key, just to explain the epithet, but leave the identity in abeyance.
Many thanks.
 
My take is still that the entry for Calliste tanagnathus refers to two consecutively numbered specimens (e.g., as per the listings of Calliste labradoroides (pp. 277-278,) and Nemosia guira (p. 279.))

No problem, James, although I'm sorry for not being convincing enough.
Still, I will note that what you see as a 'second specimen' of 'Calliste labradoroides' (now Tangara labradorides) is indicated as being from Guatemala too... where this species does not occur either.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top