• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Where premium quality meets exceptional value. ZEISS Conquest HDX.

Bald Eagle article, with proposed name change (1 Viewer)

I don't think the name change is particularly needed (except to prevent mistakes made by dumb translators - I've once seen a German translation of a novel that had it as a "bald-headed eagle" instead of the established German name of the species. Apparently checking Wikipedia is beyond some people's capacity...) but nor do I see why putting forth the argument via a newspaper is worse than the usual way, which is a buch of spergs in a committee trying to capitalize on the newest fad.
Spergs! Ha ha! Thanks for that. With only an hour to go till bedtime I was in danger of not following the sage advice to 'learn something new every day'. Will have to see how I can work that in to a sentence sometime in the very near future.

(I managed to inject the word 'ameliorate' into conversation over dinner this evening, which I was rather proud of, even if I did have to explain to the listeners what it meant)
 
I don't think the name change is particularly needed (except to prevent mistakes made by dumb translators - I've once seen a German translation of a novel that had it as a "bald-headed eagle" instead of the established German name of the species. Apparently checking Wikipedia is beyond some people's capacity...) but nor do I see why putting forth the argument via a newspaper is worse than the usual way, which is a buch of spergs in a committee trying to capitalize on the newest fad.
Because the audiences are different. doing an op-ed on a political website is not actually talking to anyone who would need to be won over for the name change to occur.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 4 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top