• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Where premium quality meets exceptional value. ZEISS Conquest HDX.

white headed cardinal? (1 Viewer)

ohio_buck_i

New member
Hi, I am new to this forum. I thought this would be a good place to get an idea as to whether it is possible that i really had seen a white headed male cardinal. Vacationing in Hilton Head Island last May, while riding the bike trails in Sea Pines Plantation, I saw what appeared to be a male red cardinal with an all white head. The rest of its body had the normal red coloration. It quickly flew away as we approached so I was only able to observe it for a short time. I wonder if this might be a form of albinism or perhaps I had mistaken it's identity, although I certainly have seen many cardinals up close before. Any thoughts?
 
Hello there ohio_buck and a warm welcome to you from those of us on staff here at BirdForum:t:

You probably did see a partial abino Northern Cardinal. As a chairperson for our local Audubon, the Chamber of Commerce here frequently refers bird related calls to me and I've had more than a few concerning our usually red-all-over Cardinals sporting white wings, white crests and white heads. I have yet to see any and my yard ususally hosts a couple of dozen of these guys.
 
hello OHio buck i u mentchend u were vesitting hhi during the summer thats cool i live there what a quinsidentces. o and about that white headed cardnail it was proboly a odd looking female
 
just saw one too!

how wonderful to see a gorgeous white-headed female cardinal just now! She and her hubby stopped by my balcony in Decatur, GA.

I went searching to see how common these partial albinos are and discovered this site.

thanks for a great forum!
 
Warning! This thread is more than 11 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top