Björn Bergenholtz
(former alias "Calalp")

As we've lately been dealing with several guys by the Surname/Family name Müller, sometimes also written/typed Muller (or even Mueller), let's have a quick look at yet another one ... even if this particular guy isn't commemorated in any Scientific Bird name (at least not as far as I know).
What about the Author (Auctor), behind many, many names of various, different Bird taxa, often mentioned as "Statius Müller", alt. "Statius Muller" (also sometimes hyphenated, either way; as "Statius-Müller, or "Statius-Muller) ... also, just as well, mentioned/listed simply (only) by his latter name (in both versions, either as; Müller, alt. Muller) ... !?!
Compare (for example) with the pre-printed head on the Richmond card (here), for "Alcedo aurea", equal of today's Great Jacamar Jacamerops aureus (P.L.S.Müller, 1776), earlier also given/cited as "Alcedo aurea Statius Müller, 1776":

At times he's been called 'German', alt. even (East) 'Frisian', or 'Dutch'.
In Zoonomen's Author Index we find him as:
His own signature, from Zoonomen's link (above):

To me, this would talk in favour of the (sole) surname Müller.
Or?
Anyone who know, which name (version) we ought to use?
Which is the better one?
Björn
PS. And what about his 'nationality' (in the 1700's) ... ?
Wikipedia for (the alleged Birth place, as given/stated above): "Esens" (here), resp. "East Frisia" (Ostfriesland) here (alt. here).
Ditto for (the alleged Death place): "Erlangen" (here), in Bavaria (Germany).
PPS. Justin, if you're still lurking around this sub-forum
, what do you say (re. both topics)? I think you've been dealing with this guy earlier, presumably in one, or the other, of your many Papers ...
[also see the Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature forum, and the old thread Zonotrichia Capensis, (post/s #9–11) here].
/B
What about the Author (Auctor), behind many, many names of various, different Bird taxa, often mentioned as "Statius Müller", alt. "Statius Muller" (also sometimes hyphenated, either way; as "Statius-Müller, or "Statius-Muller) ... also, just as well, mentioned/listed simply (only) by his latter name (in both versions, either as; Müller, alt. Muller) ... !?!
Compare (for example) with the pre-printed head on the Richmond card (here), for "Alcedo aurea", equal of today's Great Jacamar Jacamerops aureus (P.L.S.Müller, 1776), earlier also given/cited as "Alcedo aurea Statius Müller, 1776":

At times he's been called 'German', alt. even (East) 'Frisian', or 'Dutch'.
In Zoonomen's Author Index we find him as:
Muller, Philipp Ludwig Statius 1725-1776
Müller, Philipp Ludwig Statius
b. 25 April 1725 Esens, East Frisia.
d. 5 January 1776 Erlangen.
Often as "Statius Müller".
After a long tradition of using "Müller,PLS" to refer to this
author, a recent trend has employed the more cumbrous "Statius Müller"
in recognition of his double surname without hyphen.
igowever [sic –?], Kraig Adler's excellent treatment of Muller ("Contributions to the History
of Herpetology". 2012 3:39,40.) indicates that "he generally used only
Müller as his surname as is indicated here by his signature."
The graphic reproduction of his signature shows:
"P. L. St. Müller."
Muller,PLS signature
(reproduced with permission from K. Adler)
Also as Statius Muller
The styling as Mueller is presumably in the belief that Muller was
German and the use of "ue" for "ü" is appropriate. He was not
German, but Dutch. It does not cheer the Dutch to be mistaken for
Germans.
Variable narratives, each enthusiastically backed as "authentic" are
used to support different versions of his last name, and it is even
possible that one of these narratives may in fact be correct.
But which ONE?
Of some possible use is the understanding that Peters Checklist
(not necessarily to be considered an authority in such matters) uses
"P. L. S. Muller" - usually with the umlaut 22 time. "Statius Muller"
is never used in any form that I can find.
Sherborn in Index Animalium never uses the "Statius Muller" form
in anyway I can find, but uses the "P. L. S. Muller" form 326 times.
Cat.BirdsBr.Mus. uses only P. L. S. Muller.
Cat.BirdsAm. uses only P. L. S. Muller.
xxx; 2020.12.26
His own signature, from Zoonomen's link (above):

To me, this would talk in favour of the (sole) surname Müller.
Or?
Anyone who know, which name (version) we ought to use?
Which is the better one?
Björn
PS. And what about his 'nationality' (in the 1700's) ... ?
Wikipedia for (the alleged Birth place, as given/stated above): "Esens" (here), resp. "East Frisia" (Ostfriesland) here (alt. here).
Ditto for (the alleged Death place): "Erlangen" (here), in Bavaria (Germany).
PPS. Justin, if you're still lurking around this sub-forum
[also see the Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature forum, and the old thread Zonotrichia Capensis, (post/s #9–11) here].
/B
Last edited: