• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Where premium quality meets exceptional value. ZEISS Conquest HDX.

Nuthatch age/sex/race UK (1 Viewer)

Jane Turner

Registered User
Supporter
I see very few Nuthatches - but the one I saw today struck me as being unusually white underneath. It circled high for 10 mins, came down for a few seconds, circled again, tried a different aerial then left high west. There appeared to be white on the forehead and over the eye too.
 

Attachments

  • S0136260.JPG
    S0136260.JPG
    401.7 KB · Views: 241
  • S0226279-001.JPG
    S0226279-001.JPG
    854.4 KB · Views: 156
Fairly good match for the Scandinavian Nuthatch (supercilium flaring behind the eye) in Collins Bird Guide though I know nothing about plumage variation in European N in Britain and don't know how likely that would be. The Guide says nothing about migration or vagrancy, except smaller Russian/Siberian ones turning up in Finland. There have been a lot of easterly/north-easterly winds here this spring (with recent good results from that direction). Probably pretty unlikely. So I dunno basically. Looks too 'clean' to be leucistic, but that seems most likely.
 
Of course much more likely to be caesia, but it does look very pale indeed. The bill seems quite short, and doesn't it seem to have pale c.o.m.?
If so, it could perhaps be a just independent, dispersing/disorientated juvenile. This might explain the pale underside, but I have little experience with caesia juvenile.

Peter
 
Iit looks more like a Fenno Scandia europaea as it lacks the obvious white super (photo 1, although in photo 2 it is more apparent). The vent has some colour , but it is difficult to say exactly what degree and shade with any accuracy and there doesn't appear to be any deviation on the upper parts, this points in favour towards a Scandanavian bird rather than leucism, imo (I don't know if diet can affect colour production in the red spectrum, but its lack is unlikely to explain the variation in all the Fenno Scanda population, genetics sounds far more plausible.)
 
Hi Andy,

I personally think it could be Scandinavian, but was being ultra-cautious, speaking from a position of almost total ignorance! As soon as I'm positive about any tricky ID, doubts flood in immediately.

Cheers
 
Hi Andy,

I personally think it could be Scandinavian, but was being ultra-cautious, speaking from a position of almost total ignorance! As soon as I'm positive about any tricky ID, doubts flood in immediately.

Cheers

I know what you mean, I tend to look for local alternatives before I shout accidental/rarity, but looking at it logically, in all likelyhood, it won't be a Siberian bird, and Scandanavia is not that far away.
 
Of course much more likely to be caesia, but it does look very pale indeed. The bill seems quite short, and doesn't it seem to have pale c.o.m.?
If so, it could perhaps be a just independent, dispersing/disorientated juvenile. This might explain the pale underside, but I have little experience with caesia juvenile.

Peter


The bill looked thin and short to me..... certainly and odd bird. On the off chance of voice being helpful - I have a few minutes of flight call recorded!
 
Here's an 'extraordinary sighting' of a Nuthatch from the Isle of Wight, of a bird showing apparently only faint buffish on the belly and flanks (scroll down to March 15th), but notice the thinner and more extended supercilium than in Jane's bird thus resembling British birds more:

http://wightvogels.web44.net/news.html

I've done some fiddling wih Jane's photo in GIMP. The only faint buffish tones are peripheral and seem to be reflections of sunlight. Jane's bird also seems to have dark carpal feathers where one would expect to see it on Scandinavian birds - the Bird Guide shows this as lacking on British birds. All this is rambling of course.

Cheers
 
It's a normal British juvenile. They are much paler below than adults (whitish as opposed to buff), with a weaker facial pattern, and they are also dispersing round about now - the main dispersal is just 1-2 weeks after fledging. June is the time of year when you expect to see juveniles in out-of-the-ordinary places. Nice observation though, as they're usually seen just bobbing along hedgerows etc. Seeing one fly high across a river is unusual. Although would it really be 500 ft up? Height is hard to judge, but that's extremely high.

Here's a British juvenile to compare: http://www.foxglovecovert.org.uk/images/blog/c7IMG_5981.jpg
 
Last edited:
Warning! This thread is more than 11 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top