• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Where premium quality meets exceptional value. ZEISS Conquest HDX.

Nikon 8x30 EII Still Worth getting? (1 Viewer)

rdnzl

Not Sure.
United States
Title says it. Are these still worth buying or they they approaching obsolescence in the porro world?

Real user opinions please.
 
Title says it. Are these still worth buying or they they approaching obsolescence in the porro world?

Real user opinions please.
Absolutely! This is nice glass, bright, sharp , great resolution with huge usable FOV. A very elegant old style retro porro with updated coatings. I have the whole line of these Nikons, and doubles in some of them, right back to the Nikon A’s. These are not water proof or even water resistant and might be a little more delicate than some of the rubber armored roofs of the day.

These are serous optics and punch far above there price point.

And worth getting even more is the superior E.

Paul
 

Attachments

  • D7A1E058-E681-4BFC-857D-43B921DFDDDC.jpeg
    D7A1E058-E681-4BFC-857D-43B921DFDDDC.jpeg
    109.5 KB · Views: 75
  • 6F9BFEED-A879-43C4-A094-0F6FAB54A399.jpeg
    6F9BFEED-A879-43C4-A094-0F6FAB54A399.jpeg
    116.6 KB · Views: 68
  • B73F55F7-E93B-4E60-927E-4DB924F37B75.jpeg
    B73F55F7-E93B-4E60-927E-4DB924F37B75.jpeg
    168.9 KB · Views: 75
  • AFF926BA-96F7-4FDA-BB84-9AB566542549.jpeg
    AFF926BA-96F7-4FDA-BB84-9AB566542549.jpeg
    319.7 KB · Views: 71
How much would be a reasonable price for a NIB?

Is the E the older version?
I see go for $450-$500 all the time NIB. The E then the improved E C (criterion designation) then EII. The SE’s were being produced at similar times from late 1990’s I believe.

Paul
 
EII's are fantastic. I count them as my good weather leisure binocular and look for any excuses to take them out. I don't like the way they hang so less likely to take them on longer walks. Also do not perform as well on dull overcast days. Damp mornings, they certainly stay at home. But if the weather is good they take precedence over any alpha roof for me. Gorgeous, vivid and immersive view. I paid £380 for mine some years ago, can't decide whether I would do the same on the now £600 price tag.
 
There's nothing "obsolescent" about an EII. With the latest coatings, it's absolutely lovely and a joy to use, when I can pry it out of my wife's hands. All this has been said so many times here that I finally got one, as I should have sooner even though I'm a 10x guy, so this is high praise. (It's lightweight and one can simply accept the angle it hangs at, which isn't actually problematic, as so many have before.)
 
Last edited:
 
The Nikon EII 8 x 30 is my favourite binocular. No question.

Easy on the eye to look at as well as to look through. It's also a masterpiece of ergonomic design..., such a joy to hold in my hands.

I don't use it in wet weather. Indeed I rarely glass at all in wet weather as the visibility is poor in pretty much any glass under those conditions. Scottish dreich is dreich after all.

I serendipitously discovered a big improvement with the oft quoted 'hang' problem with the E II when I swapped out the shorter neck strap on my newly restored Nikon E 10 x 35 for the one supplied with the 8 x 30. A shorter strap makes it hang much better.

Neil.
IMG_4553.jpg
 
Absolutely! This is nice glass, bright, sharp , great resolution with huge usable FOV. A very elegant old style retro porro with updated coatings. I have the whole line of these Nikons, and doubles in some of them, right back to the Nikon A’s. These are not water proof or even water resistant and might be a little more delicate than some of the rubber armored roofs of the day.

These are serous optics and punch far above there price point.

And worth getting even more is the superior E.

Paul
What makes the E superior to the E II ?
 
What makes the E superior to the E II ?
Not sure what your asking. The E2 is superior to the E , it’s the evolution and upgrade to the E series.
If your asking what I meant in the last sentence “And worth getting even more is the superior E” then I was referring to the Nikon SE model ( known as the superior E) which was Nikons premium (alpha) porro.
 

Attachments

  • 611EEDA6-712C-4661-90B8-451BB0F009EC.jpeg
    611EEDA6-712C-4661-90B8-451BB0F009EC.jpeg
    129.4 KB · Views: 37
I think (with some exceptions) there seems to be a consensus that the EII 8x30 are very nice binoculars. I've surely enjoyed mine over the last 4 years. As for their worthiness, well that's a difficult and personal question (which is why I guess it was asked in the first place).

More and more I see a problem with its price, at least in Europe, which is around 600 Eur currently. Yes, you can find it for around 450 € from Japan, but (at least in Spain, I guess it's the same for the rest of the EU) you'd have to pay the pretty hefty import taxes, you you would end up paying more than 500 €, probably somewhere near 600 €. And the issue is that not that long ago you could get them for way less than that.

Yes, they have a unique view: easy, expansive, comfy and deep. The way your hands cup around their body is just great. But then, they also have some serious drawbacks, especially considering their price: namely not being waterproof (which means they can fog up and there's the risk of fungus... I have first hand experience regarding that). And the problem is that there is a growing number of really solid performers in the 500 € region. No, they won't give you some of what the EII gives you (great FOV, immersive Porro image), but they will give you other things like waterproofness, better portability, better accessories, etc.

Last but not least, I think a great deal of the "worthiness" of the EII is related to whether the owner has other binoculars or the EII is the only one. In the first case, I can see the EII as a very interesting addition to a small collection, to enjoy its many charms. However, if we are talking about having a single bino, then I don't think I would recommend them (or have them as my only bino), because I think there are too many compromises.
 
Last edited:
Not sure what your asking. The E2 is superior to the E , it’s the evolution and upgrade to the E series.
If your asking what I meant in the last sentence “And worth getting even more is the superior E” then I was referring to the Nikon SE model ( known as the superior E) which was Nikons premium (alpha) porro.
"
These are serous optics and punch far above there price point.

And worth getting even more is the superior E.

Paul"

It was this statement that had me scratching my head, but you have now clarified it. I had not heard of a Superior E.
 
Not sure what your asking. The E2 is superior to the E , it’s the evolution and upgrade to the E series.
If your asking what I meant in the last sentence “And worth getting even more is the superior E” then I was referring to the Nikon SE model ( known as the superior E) which was Nikons premium (alpha) porro.
The SE 8x32 is better than the EII for many people. The SE 8x32 has been a reference standard by reviewers for years.
Spend a little time on the site, "Better View Desired", read about these excellent porros, and educate yourself.
I have had multiple examples of each over the years. The E2 is not superior to the Superior E.
Jerry
 
The SE 8x32 is better than the EII for many people. The SE 8x32 has been a reference standard by reviewers for years.
Spend a little time on the site, "Better View Desired", read about these excellent porros, and educate yourself.
I have had multiple examples of each over the years. The E2 is not superior to the Superior E.
Jerry
Hi Jerry,

I have spent more time on Better View Desired, as well as numerous other review sites and web channels much more than I care to divulge. I don’t think that there’s much more I could educate myself about the Nikon E, EII and SE’s. I have multiples of all of these little jewels in my collection, not that that would mean I’m an expert , but I have a good handle on which ones are which. Im not sure where I stated that the E2’s were better , I may have used the word superior and that may have been confusing.

I clarify my thoughts, the E2’s are good glass , but not on the same level as the SE’s (Premier SE also known as Superior E ) models. The SE was Nikons top of the line Porro , and was not only named Superior E, but they were superior (better) to any of the E series binoculars before them , in Optical quality.

Paul
 

Attachments

  • 6C91C3B6-7F81-477A-B417-6438B668865B.jpeg
    6C91C3B6-7F81-477A-B417-6438B668865B.jpeg
    155.4 KB · Views: 30
Warning! This thread is more than 3 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top