• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Where premium quality meets exceptional value. ZEISS Conquest HDX.

News from Zeiss - SFL 50 (2 Viewers)

Interesting that this explanation of optics was from someone at the Research Microscopy division at Zeiss. Their optics do a completely different job from binoculars.

I know optics work in basically the same way but I wonder what the explanation would be from someone in their Sports Optics division.
It would be the same because it would probably be AI also. You're asking the same computer the same question.
 
Zeiss still do in the Victory RF line.

I suspect the SFL50 would be longer and heavier if they did use AK.
For sure, that is why Zeiss used SP prisms. I still think AK prisms perform better because I every time I try a binocular with an AK prism I notice it has better contrast, brightness, it is more transparent and it is sharper. The only AK binoculars I know of in 42mm are the Zeiss HT's in 8x42 and 10x42, Razor UHD's in 8x42 and 10x42, FL 8x42 and Maven B.2 in 9x45 and 11x45. There are some AK's in 56mm, like the SLC's and FL's, but they get too big for birding. Sorry Henry. :)
 
Last edited:
The icing on the cake would be Zeiss using Abbe-KΓΆnig optical systems in the future again.
Exactly, but I don't see it happening now that they are into making their binoculars smaller and lighter. An AK will always be a bigger, longer binocular.
 
This thread has turned into a melee - in true Birdforum tradition.
For some first look and feel impressions, see this thread:

 
The new Conquest HDX are AK, which is great IMHO.
Just the big 56mm Conquest HDX use AK prisms. The 8x56,10x56 and 15x56. The 42mm and 32mm Conquest HDX use SP prisms. I like a 8x42 with an AK prism because they are lighter, and the only two I know of are the Zeiss HT 8x42 and the Vortex Razor UHD 8x42. The Maven B.2 with an AK only comes in a 9x45 and 11x45 only. The Zeiss HT is lighter than the Razor UHD at 28 oz. but it only has 7.7 degree FOV and the UHD is heavier at 32 oz. but it has a larger 8.0 degree FOV. I have the Razor UHD 8x42, and it is an alpha for 1/2 the costs of the SF or NL.
 
Last edited:
Interesting that this explanation of optics was from someone at the Research Microscopy division at Zeiss. Their optics do a completely different job from binoculars.

I know optics work in basically the same way but I wonder what the explanation would be from someone in their Sports Optics division.
I took the more relevant point to be the "Business Development" department following the correspondent's name. It wouldn't be easy to reach an actual optical engineer... who wouldn't divulge anything remotely resembling a trade secret anyway.

In the very near future, when androids and robots start appearing, you are never going to know if you are talking to a real person or a computer.
Sometimes we can hardly tell already. Humans talk about things without understanding them too.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top