• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Where premium quality meets exceptional value. ZEISS Conquest HDX.

I saw this pheasant today. Unfortunately the image is blurry. I have never seen all white pheasant before, are they rare (2 Viewers)

Hi Suzanne and a warm welcome to you from all the Staff and Moderators. Leucistic birds are not very uncommon but if I'm seeing this bird correctly it looks to be albino (bare parts are pink (eyes could be but I can't make them out properly).

I'll move your post to the ID forum so you can get more input.

I'm sure you will enjoy it here and I look forward to hearing your news.
 
Hi Suzanne and a warm welcome to you from all the Staff and Moderators. Leucistic birds are not very uncommon but if I'm seeing this bird correctly it looks to be albino (bare parts are pink (eyes could be but I can't make them out properly).

I'll move your post to the ID forum so you can get more input.

I'm sure you will enjoy it here and I look forward to hearing your news.
It had red around the beak but the rest was all white. I see a lot of pheasants on my road but this was the first time I have seen a white one. Hopefully I will see it again and get a better picture
 
I'm not certain it's a "pheasant" (genus phasianus, as in common pheasant phasianus colchicus). The tail seems too short (though that could be an illusion from the blurry photo). It's in the pheasant family phaisanidae, no doubt. I'm wondering if it might be a rock partridge (alectoris graeca), which would help explain the rather red beak and legs.
 
I'm not certain it's a "pheasant" (genus phasianus, as in common pheasant phasianus colchicus). The tail seems too short (though that could be an illusion from the blurry photo). It's in the pheasant family phaisanidae, no doubt. I'm wondering if it might be a rock partridge (alectoris graeca), which would help explain the rather red beak and legs.

I'm not certain it's a "pheasant" (genus phasianus, as in common pheasant phasianus colchicus). The tail seems too short (though that could be an illusion from the blurry photo). It's in the pheasant family phaisanidae, no doubt. I'm wondering if it might be a rock partridge (alectoris graeca), which would help explain the rather red beak and legs.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0261.mov
    2 MB
Oooh, the tail looks much longer in the video. And I think the red is near the eye, not the beak itself. I changed my mind, it's a white breed of pheasant. They are sometimes bred deliberately for hunting.
 
Oooh, the tail looks much longer in the video. And I think the red is near the eye, not the beak itself. I changed my mind, it's a white breed of pheasant. They are sometimes bred deliberately for hunting.
I believe there's an etiquette amongst the shooting fraternity that the white birds can't be shot & shooters are fined for shooting them accidentally on commercial shoots.
 
Yep they are bred specifically for shooting.

I also heard because they are white it makes it easier to see, and they can then lead you to find the other pheasants, hence why it's bad etiquette to shoot them.

I saw my first one like this at Oxford Island. They are pretty, but a grim hobby imo.
 
Yep they are bred specifically for shooting.

I also heard because they are white it makes it easier to see, and they can then lead you to find the other pheasants, hence why it's bad etiquette to shoot them.

I saw my first one like this at Oxford Island. They are pretty, but a grim hobby imo.
😢
 
Many hundreds of Pheasants are released for shooting purposes on a local estate, including a fair proportion of all white, 'leucistic' individuals so no, they aren't at all rare.

RB
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top