• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Where premium quality meets exceptional value. ZEISS Conquest HDX.

How long before a premium Chinese binocular? (1 Viewer)

Leif

Well-known member
As the title says. This is motivated by my seeing a Hawke Frontier 8x43 ED, which is a lot of binocular for the money. It includes a lot of technology: glass, optical design, prisms, and I assume dichroic coatings. Whilst I have not used this instrument for more than 5 minutes, the only obvious flaw is lots of edge softness. They seemed to have a bright clear view with almost no colour fringes, and a wide field, albeit with lots of edge softness.

Dyson moved production overseas. Pure (radios) manufacture in China. iPods are mode in China. The quality is great.

And where do the Chinese get their knowledge from? Are they learning from Western and Japanese companies who have factories in China? Are they hiring Western/Japanese engineers? How do they get coating technology (dichroics for example)?

I have heard that the Chinese government have put a huge emphasis on knowledge transfer (to China), and they are known as a hard working intelligent people. I imagine Western companies are not unaware of the competition (that is understatement).
 
As the title says. This is motivated by my seeing a Hawke Frontier 8x43 ED, which is a lot of binocular for the money. It includes a lot of technology: glass, optical design, prisms, and I assume dichroic coatings. Whilst I have not used this instrument for more than 5 minutes, the only obvious flaw is lots of edge softness. They seemed to have a bright clear view with almost no colour fringes, and a wide field, albeit with lots of edge softness.

Dyson moved production overseas. Pure (radios) manufacture in China. iPods are mode in China. The quality is great.

And where do the Chinese get their knowledge from? Are they learning from Western and Japanese companies who have factories in China? Are they hiring Western/Japanese engineers? How do they get coating technology (dichroics for example)?

I have heard that the Chinese government have put a huge emphasis on knowledge transfer (to China), and they are known as a hard working intelligent people. I imagine Western companies are not unaware of the competition (that is understatement).

Leif:

The latest effort from Hawke is the Panorama binocular. It is the previously
announced premium model to compete with the other binoculars using a flat field
design for less field curvature, and less distortion.

I would think the UK would get them first, and I just found one of the
large US internet sellers shows the 10x42 as shipping.

These are among the newest higher priced binoculars comiing out of China.

Jerry
 
Similarish subject; fairly recent thread :
http://www.birdforum.net/showthread.php?t=242218

Is this where the best stuff is coming from atm?
http://www.united-optics.com/Products/Binoculars/Hunting_Birding_Outdoor_Binoculars.html

Is it true that by buying a binocular with "Made in China" on it I can be happy and assured that none of its components have been outsourced? |:d|

Norm:

You can be assured, but not happy, China does not import much at all
when considering manufactured goods.
I see many trains going by each day, with ship containers of cheap China
stuff going all over the USA. They go back empty.

In the news today, Beijing, China, had an air pollution index of 755 on
a scale of 500. Way over the top, and too polluted for children and most
anyone to be in the filth.



Jerry
 
Jerry, I imagine what you want to say would take an awful lot more words and reasoned argument than the small collection of statements you've posted here (however obvious it may be to you what you are saying). However not sure the moderators would feel this to be the appropriate place. One for the "Ruffled Feathers" forum perhaps?
 
Jerry, I imagine what you want to say would take an awful lot more words and reasoned argument than the small collection of statements you've posted here (however obvious it may be to you what you are saying). However not sure the moderators would feel this to be the appropriate place. One for the "Ruffled Feathers" forum perhaps?

Norm:

You have your answer, and it seems you are happy ? Or not.
I really don't give a drift.

Jerry
 
Leif,
I believe the answer is any time they think it is most profitable to do so.

What I want to see is, can they play in the big leagues of innovation? L, S, and Z (and Hensoldt a long time ago) have been the movers and shakers of the roof prism binocular. Nikon seems just a bit the copycat to me. It's not just the quality of the device, but the quality of the ideas, that costs the big bucks.
Ron
 
As the title says. This is motivated by my seeing a Hawke Frontier 8x43 ED, which is a lot of binocular for the money. It includes a lot of technology: glass, optical design, prisms, and I assume dichroic coatings. Whilst I have not used this instrument for more than 5 minutes, the only obvious flaw is lots of edge softness. They seemed to have a bright clear view with almost no colour fringes, and a wide field, albeit with lots of edge softness.

Dyson moved production overseas. Pure (radios) manufacture in China. iPods are mode in China. The quality is great.

And where do the Chinese get their knowledge from? Are they learning from Western and Japanese companies who have factories in China? Are they hiring Western/Japanese engineers? How do they get coating technology (dichroics for example)?

I have heard that the Chinese government have put a huge emphasis on knowledge transfer (to China), and they are known as a hard working intelligent people. I imagine Western companies are not unaware of the competition (that is understatement).

dichroics? Is that the Brit equivalent of dielectrics? Sort of a fries and chips thing?

Long before you started this thread, and I'm talking maybe 5 or 6 years ago, I started a thread on Cloudy Nights tilted "Haute Chinese?" which asked the same question you're asking, so you're not the only one to think of something before somebody else and not get credited. ;)

This was before Hawke came along, and when Zen Ray 7x36 ED2 was still a twinkle in Charles' eye (or was that veiling glare? :).

Generally, the opinion was that we were decades away from seeing a premium bin coming out of China, but I was more optimistic (had to be, I couldn't and still can't afford an alpha!). They have certainly "come a long way, baby" since the first Chinese Monarch with its stiff focuser and floppy eyecups (well, they still have floppy eyecups) to the ZR ED2 and its twin Hawke ED.

I tried a Hawke 8x36 ED and compared it to my 8x32 SE, and I was impressed with it, particularly for the price: $299. Same identical body as the ZR 7x36 ED2, which I find very comfortable to hold. Less pincushion than the 7x ED2 though not as wide a FOV. Only tried them in the sun, so I'm not sure how I would react to the edges under dimmer light, and the CA control seemed pretty good (and you know how bad CA can get on sunny days! ;)

I think the recession was a good thing for Chinese bins and perhaps, as someone suggested, why Zeiss made the Terra ED (not saying it's Chinese, to be be clear, but rather that perhaps sales have dipped a bit at the top shelf over the past four years - not that you'd know from reading these forums -- and that the fastest growing segment is not the top nor the bottom but the middle).

It reminds me of how Japanese cars, which were previously shunned by just about everybody besides college students back in the 1970s, suddenly became popular when the gas crises hit the US in the mid and late '70s.

Similarly, this recent financial crisis gave ChinBins an opening to grab a bigger market share. Even the "Red Scare" crowd over on Optics Talk and 24hourcampfire seemed to finally be coming around to the economic reality that they could get decent quality optics from China. Companies such as Zen Ray, Hawke and Theron stepped in and helped bridge the gap between the haves and have nots in the hunting world.

I think it's actually easier to sell hunters on ChinBins these days than birders, who are fussier about their optics. While those with deep pockets and upturned noses might still snub ChinBins, I don't think there's any going back now.

Here's an excerpt from an article on this topic by Holger Merlitz, who works in China:

"How far have binoculars "Made in China" come during the past 5 years? In my opinion, the review on this page has confirmed that by now there exist several lines of binoculars which offer a decent performance level. The quality of coating has been continuously improved over the years. It is also obvious that the optical designers know how to operate their software in order to generate binoculars which are well corrected over reasonably wide field of views. Five years ago, decent binoculars from China were still rare items, and to find a good one was similar to winning a lottery. Today, it is easy to find binoculars of considerable performance and reliable quality for a reasonable price, and this is the case for many different sizes, including giant binoculars for astronomy."

The rest of the review:
http://www.holgermerlitz.de/chinese8x40.html

<B>
 
Last edited:
Similarish subject; fairly recent thread :
http://www.birdforum.net/showthread.php?t=242218

Is this where the best stuff is coming from atm?
http://www.united-optics.com/Products/Binoculars/Hunting_Birding_Outdoor_Binoculars.html

Is it true that by buying a binocular with "Made in China" on it I can be happy and assured that none of its components have been outsourced? |:d|

Thanks Norm, I had not seen that thread. Maybe we should migrate over to it?

I think some people do not see the humour in that last sentence. It made me laugh. |:D| On a side note, I have noticed that Americans on this forum often take what I write very literally, which can be a problem.

Leif,
I believe the answer is any time they think it is most profitable to do so.

What I want to see is, can they play in the big leagues of innovation? L, S, and Z (and Hensoldt a long time ago) have been the movers and shakers of the roof prism binocular. Nikon seems just a bit the copycat to me. It's not just the quality of the device, but the quality of the ideas, that costs the big bucks.
Ron

Excellent point. Zeiss has come up with many technological innovations, Leica too, I'm not sure about Swarovski despite the quality of their products.

dichroics? Is that the Brit equivalent of dielectrics?

No, it was a typo on my part, sorry. A dichroic filter separates out colours. The technologies are similar i.e. thin films constructed using vacuum deposition or similar.
 
Leif,

I wanted to be another poster to welcome you back after a long absence. I can honestly say that it was posts by you, and other individuals, many years ago that originally attracted me to this forum.

My opinion of the situation is that, from an optical perspective, the Chinese have already reached a level where they are competitive with many of the most expensive European and Japanese models. Only the most discriminating users can find the ever so subtle differences between the most advanced Chinese models and the current crop of "alphas".

I want to bring up two specific examples to illustrate this. In the binocular market we now have a small number of models that offer all of the features of the trend-setting alphas. If we take the Swarovski Swarovision as an example and compare it directly to the Zen Ray Prime HD you will see the same list of features:

- Dielectric prism coatings
- Field Flattener lens elements
- ED glass objectives
- Fully-multicoated glass surfaces
- etc.....

Those individuals that have compared the two (or, if you like, you can throw the Nikon EDG into the mix) have found some optical differences but those differences are extremely subtle. In my mind it begs the question as to whether those differences are actual differences in performance versus pecularities between slightly different though similar designs. In other words, who is to determine whether the Zeiss HT's higher light transmission is more beneficial than the Swaro SV's better edge performance? Is one actually "better" than the other or is it simply a design compromise and both represent the same overall level of performance?

Another example would be in the spotting scope arena. The top dog, up until the last 4 months or so, has been the Kowa Prominar. Now the Swarovski Modular models seem to have stolen the spotlight. Prior to those two models being introduced I think it is a fair statement to say that the Nikon Fieldscope 82 was held in very high esteem and certainly comparable to the European "top dogs". Now you might ask how this has to do with any competing Chinese models. Well, a few years ago one of the Chinese manufacturers, Bosma, introduced a model that is basically a clone of the of the Nikon Fieldscope 82 ED A. It has been rebranded under several names but the company that sells it in the US is Theron Optics. I own the scope. I have also had the opportunity to compare it with the Nikon equivalent and have even interchanged eyepieces between the two scopes on numerous occasions. I can say that the Theron scope is certainly in the same class as the Nikon which would then, subsequently, put it in the same class as the top Euro models (with the exception of larger aperture models referenced earlier). Yes, there are some subtle differences that professional reviewers have noted between the Nikon and the Bosma scopes but the question is whether or not those subtle differences affect the overall performance score enough to move it out of that top tier of scopes.

In my opinion it isn't optical performance that now separates the high-end Chinese instruments from their European and Japanese counterparts. It is the issue of quality control. From personal experience I don't believe that the quality control level is comparable. To put it in simpler terms, if you get a cherry Chinese alpha then it is going to be at the same level as an average Euro/Japanese model. If you get an average Chinese manufacturered instrument then it isn't going to be comparable to the highest performing models out there. The manufacturing tolerances and overall quality control just isn't there.

After having said that I do want to take this a step further. Even when the time comes that the Chinese quality control level is comparable I still do not believe that many individuals will place those instruments at the same level as the other alphas. I believe the Chinese are going to have to raise the bar from a performance perspective. When they introduce a model that "betters" the European and Japanese models in some noticeable and measureable way then they will finally reach "alpha" status.
 
Last edited:
I tend to agree with Frank.

Also there is the not insignificant matter of perception. While it works anti Chinese, it also works pro German/Austrian. With the anti Chinese perception, the simple fact of the matter is that nobody will likely pay more than around $700 current top end for something known to be Chinese. On the other hand we see on hunting forums in particular the question of..."hey guys I need binoculars but don't have a fortune and don't want Chinese, what do you recommend?". It never takes more than a couple of posts for somebody to pop in with "get a Steiner Predator Xtreme, good low price German glass, not Chinese". Hang the fact the Xtreme is almost certainly a mainly Chinese sourced binocular. Same thing with the new Steiner Nighthunter XP. Steiner has a facility in China and since they quit the Peregrine XP, they may well not build anything in Germany any more. Same thing with Minox, which is another one recommended as "good German glass, no Chinese". Minox has always been a major player in Japanese Optics, and like all major Japanese Optics concerns it too has to have major Chinese connections. Considering some of the outsourcing obfuscation from the Conquest HD (Kamakura or German) form the Terra ED thread, how much of that is going on with the Minox "made in Germany" labeling. I have a feeling Zeiss is not the sole company outsourcing here, nor keeping it under their hats to boot.

It will take some time and some baby steps for we see an all out Chinese "alpha competitor", just because of perception.

We'll see other ZEN Prime HD level stuff first. Hawke may or may not lay an egg with the Panorama. That looks like the rejected design of the initial concept of the ZEN Prime HD. But, maybe they have, or will fix it. We will likely see other companies using more Chinese outsourcing, but they won't be up front about it, simply due to perception.

Shott glass is not some magic glass either. Shott has factories in China, it's more about the desired outcome than the source. All glass makers can produce multiple quality levels, depending on what a lens in a particular place in a system needs to do there.
 
Last edited:
Steve,

How do you know Steiner has an facility in China? This was a well 'hidden" secret.

The last time I visited the Steiner factory in Bayruth (Germany not Libanon) there were allready rumours that the roofs weren't made by Steiner in Germany but in China, but the rep's wouldn't say it out loud, so I asked one of the female employees who was working on a porro bin where they kept the roof prisms.
And the answered in German: "We don't have roof prisms here".
So much for Made in Germany.

Later on Gijs van Ginkel went to the same factory and he saw a complete productionline of roof bino's.

Now a days Steiner is sold to Beretta Italy.

The top model of Steiner in roof is the Discoverer which has lousy plastic eyecups that keep falling off from the beginning 'till now (a few years later). They changed it into metal. That took some time to upgrade. One could wonder why it took so long?

Jan.
 
Steve,

How do you know Steiner has an facility in China? This was a well 'hidden" secret.

The last time I visited the Steiner factory in Bayruth (Germany not Libanon) there were allready rumours that the roofs weren't made by Steiner in Germany but in China, but the rep's wouldn't say it out loud, so I asked one of the female employees who was working on a porro bin where they kept the roof prisms.
And the answered in German: "We don't have roof prisms here".
So much for Made in Germany.

Later on Gijs van Ginkel went to the same factory and he saw a complete productionline of roof bino's.

Now a days Steiner is sold to Beretta Italy.

The top model of Steiner in roof is the Discoverer which has lousy plastic eyecups that keep falling off from the beginning 'till now (a few years later). They changed it into metal. That took some time to upgrade. One could wonder why it took so long?

Jan.

BTW, in many respects these Steiner Discoveries were progenitors of the Swarovisions. From my memory they were at least the first roof binoculars that came with long eye relief, wide FOV and sharpness up to the edge together in one package.

Steve
 
Steve,

How do you know Steiner has an facility in China? This was a well 'hidden" secret.

The last time I visited the Steiner factory in Bayruth (Germany not Libanon) there were allready rumours that the roofs weren't made by Steiner in Germany but in China, but the rep's wouldn't say it out loud, so I asked one of the female employees who was working on a porro bin where they kept the roof prisms.
And the answered in German: "We don't have roof prisms here".
So much for Made in Germany.

Later on Gijs van Ginkel went to the same factory and he saw a complete productionline of roof bino's.

Now a days Steiner is sold to Beretta Italy.

The top model of Steiner in roof is the Discoverer which has lousy plastic eyecups that keep falling off from the beginning 'till now (a few years later). They changed it into metal. That took some time to upgrade. One could wonder why it took so long?

Jan.

Good question and here is the path by which I arrived at that bit of information. Back in about 2008, I received a Steiner Peregrine, and Steiner Peregrine XP for review. The binoculars were provided by Steiner through their then brand new NYC dealer, CameralandNY.
http://www.birdforum.net/showthread.php?t=142051&highlight=Steiner+Peregrine+review
There is the link for the review, FWIW, both Kevin Purcell and Frank D got eye time withe these two binoculars.

I was living in Washington State at the time and I spent a weekend on an optics trip to several large optics dealers in Washington to get some comparisons of the other alpha glass to the XP's. One of these places was the large Cabela's near Spokane, WA. I was talking to Cabela's Optics Manager and he remarked at how good the XP was. He said that so far Cabela's (his store anyway) hadn't seen any Steiner product. He then retracted that statement and went and produced a 10x42 Cabela's Outfitter series binocular. They had a sub $500 price sticker and were an amazingly good binocular. I asked him about the price and he simply answered that Cabela's had negotiated the specifics with Steiner and that Steiner was producing them in Steiner's new China facility. They had just received the then new line of Outfitter binoculars, and evidently no gag order had been issued by Cabela's to their outlets to keep the source quiet. Evidently Cabela's was sort of a trial voyage for that Steiner facility.

The next dealer, a Sportsman's Warehouse just across the border in Idaho, who did have some Steiner binoculars, pretty much confirmed what the Cabela's man has said, that yes as far as he knew, Steiner had in fact just opened a new facility in China, and he did not however know what parts of the Steiner offerings, either in total, or in certain parts Steiner would come to use this facility for.

I have seen the Steiner Predator Xtreme, and it is a literal physical dead ringer for that Cabela's Outfitter binocular. My assumption, and it is only that is for that quality of a binocular to come from Steiner with that low a price level, that the China connection was/is alive and well. Now, on both the Outfitter and the Xtreme, there is ample evidence printed on the box, etc of German, design, engineering, quality, and durability, but nowhere does the phrase "Made in Germany" ever appear. In the Outfitter, there was a sentence in the information in the box that the Outfitter was made by Steiner for Cabela's.

Another thing I now find curious, is that then, I could Google information on a new Steiner facility in China. I just tried that again a few minutes ago and nothing came up. It was not a serious attempt to get any sort of information I could use in an investigative report, but back in 2008, the information popped right up.

So there it is, for better or worse. I stand prepared to eat Crow if that can be proved wrong. I was basing that on my dated 2008 level information, but that was corroborated in several places at the time, so I took it for face value at that point.
 
Last edited:
Hello FrankD: Thank you for the welcome.

Interesting remarks about QC. Moving production to China and other cheap countries is the norm for many companies as is well known. Nikon have facilities in Thailand, and China. I cannot see why Steiner and others would be so furtive, unless they think the "Made in Germany" brand is so important. I have a VW Up car (automobile), made in Eastern Europe, so it has German design, cheaper labour, suits me.

Perhaps they see themselves as luxury brands. When quartz watches appeared, the Swiss watch industry was stuffed. They slowly reinvented themselves as luxury brand items.

I must say the various 'budget' instruments I handled recently were surprisingly decent.

Regarding cheap labour, the Chinese have a right to industrialise, as we once did.
 
I cannot see why Steiner and others would be so furtive, unless they think the "Made in Germany" brand is so important.

I'm not sure that the German companies aren't so close mouthed because the fact that so many people have been so enamored of the fact of their perception of "German/Austrian superiority in optics" that they likely see no good use from disabusing people of the notion.

Not to say that German/Austrian optics can't be superior, the evidence speaks for itself.

We might want to look at the evolution of the Monarch 7 to see what Nikon does next with that name and design. A Monarch EDG maybe?
 
Warning! This thread is more than 12 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top