• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Where premium quality meets exceptional value. ZEISS Conquest HDX.

How come when I run a high pass/low pass filter... (1 Viewer)

Steelflight

Well-known member
How come when I run a low pass and/or high pass filter on my recordings in Audacity (High pass-250, Low pass-600), these frequencies still appear when I load these edited wav files in Praat? I really like Praat's spectrograms, sonograms, and the various analyses you can do with them.

I filtered out a recording with a high pass of 250 Hz and a low pass of 600, but I still get a pickup of 1xx Hz in my spectrograms in Praat. Anyone know what the deal is? I thought the filter would have "attenuated" such a low frequency...

Thanks!
 
I thought the filter would have "attenuated" such a low frequency...

It has. But you have to ask yourself by how much. Your spectrogram shows a typical range of about 60dB, and to ask a 250Hz filter to have attenuated an octave down by more than 60dB is asking a lot - how steep did you specify your filter, and if you are filtering that hard, how do you know you are not corrupting the signal? A filter blends from the passband to the stopband, and typically steeper filters adversely affect the tonal quality.

You ideally want to get a bit closer, but you do have a signal that is visible so you shouldn't need to filter that hard. Try expanding the LF section or use a log frequency scale
 
Take this recording of a scops owl for example. I love the loneliness of this owl signal coming from about half of a mile away, but let's face it I'm not going to win awards with it as it is weak and swamped by crickets. I don't generally do filtering if I want a spectrogram, so let's see what this does.

scops1.png is what I get if I take this into Raven straight. Pretty rough though the owl signal is visible. Let's see what we can do. First thing to note is I am looking over a long period of time (2.5 secs) so I am not placing a premium on temporal resolution. So let's see if some frequency resolution helps - owl songs nend to be long notes held for a while, as opposed to say the twittering of a wren. So I rack up the resolution bar on Raven (the right-hand slider) all the way up to 975, which gets me scops1_res975.png

I then observe that all the action I want is down low, and i can get rid of those pesky crickets if I zoom in to the frequency range using the + sign on the vertical slider in Raven to give me a closeup of the range 0 - 3.8kHz. I don't need all the HF rubbish. I observe the scops starts at 1.6kHz rapidly falling to 1.3kHz which is held pretty much steady with a faitn waver at the end. If I were looking for harmonics I would look for the second harmnic at 1.6kHz x 2 - 3.2kHz but there isn't any above the noise floor so I guess this is a pretty pure call.

This was recorded with a parabolic dish at night and you really shouldn't try and record things half a mile away but Raven can still pull something from the mess. You don't need any filtering if you are simply using the sound file for spectrograms - it doesn't help make things more visible. It can help tmake things more listenable - the owl would be clearer if I filtered out some to the HF from the crickets, though I would damage the soundscape, such as it is.
 

Attachments

  • scops1.png
    scops1.png
    208.5 KB · Views: 123
  • scops1_res975.png
    scops1_res975.png
    217.4 KB · Views: 138
  • scops1_res975_zm.png
    scops1_res975_zm.png
    225.8 KB · Views: 140
  • 070513_T254_scops_trm-1.wmv
    225.5 KB · Views: 127
Warning! This thread is more than 18 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top