Southern Viking
Well-known member

I can't see why, I'm afraid (if you're thinking of the (one) broad-looking wing, that's just because that wing is raised as part of the regular teetering flight and so foreshortened).overall structure says Greater
Cracking shot by the way AndyGuilty of suggestion bias, I almost commented that the contrast in the underwing is far greater than I'd expect.
Attached is one of mine for contrast.
What about the contrast in the underwing, it's glaring compared to what it should be for that species, primaries and secondaries should be at least, dusky, as in my shot? It should appear long winged and slim, this doesn't hence my initial comment on structure being more like Greater (blame that on David Ascanio's book btw)Lesser yellow headed vulture. To note the first of the ebird headline photos shows an identical head pattern/colouration
What about the contrast in the underwing, it's glaring compared to what it should be for that species, primaries and secondaries should be at least, dusky, as in my shot? It should appear long winged and slim, this doesn't hence my initial comment on structure being more like Greater (blame that on David Ascanio's book btw)
Would be interesting if someone has the ability to provide a side by side of this and the bird on ebird.
The photo certainly doesn't look slim/long-winged but I think Butty is right in that it appears to be tilting in flight which perhaps is making it look shorter and broader winged than it isThanks SV, I couldn't have imagined that either of these species could appear so contrasting in the under wing to the extant that everything I've looked at is misleading.
I also, still, do not think the OP could be described as slim or long winged.
But the bird appears to be overhead of the photographer making this suggestion less plausible IMHO, I don't think you can tell that the birds banking or turning from this shot. My shot, shows a much, slimmer bird which does look like it might be circling, I don't remember but structurally, the two are very different..The photo certainly doesn't look slim/long-winged but I think Butty is right in that it appears to be tilting in flight which perhaps is making it look shorter and broader winged than it is
The fact that you don't understand my 'problem' is neither here nor there and I simply asked if hybrids are known and did not suggest that this is one.I fear I don't follow your points at all. Greater yellow-headed vulture and lesser yellow-headed vulture are different species and therefore, potentially, may have quite different underwings - and the literature does indicate that this is the case as I described in my earlier post. Your (excellent and educational) photo is a greater yellow-headed vulture, and the OP's photo is (for reasons I gave above) not of that species, so there is no necessity for there to be any similarity between them. You've lost me on this point I'm afraid.
As I pointed out in my previous post, the mere fact that the OP's bird has one wing appearing substantially broader than the other can only be due to it flying tilted to one side, which is what these species constantly and characteristically do. It's perfectly in order for it to be directly overhead when it's doing that, and the photo that we have here is what would result from that situation.
I'm afraid I don't understand what your problem is with this.
Hybrids... please, please, no. There isn't the faintest of reasons or needs to raise that as an option here.
In my opinion.
Is it? That's not apparent to me, and I think the effect you're describing is caused simply by both of the OP's bird's wings being raised away from the camera (one more than the other) and thus (both) foreshortened, whereas your bird's wings are flatter and thus look narrower. Trying to assess these sorts of differences from single photos is both difficult and unwise, especially if one is not taking account of the way that the birds fly in life.substantially, bulkier than my Greater