Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Where premium quality meets exceptional value. ZEISS Conquest HDX.

Reply to thread

Message

There’s so much to unpack in the posters descriptions and opinions. There is no doubt that the Nikon EDG’s here is the superior optic In almost every way. I would love to see how that comparison would’ve been if he was comparing it to an 8x32 EDG. 7 x 42 I might say , IMO is the better overall platform, especially when comparing these two. Might be different if we were comparing the EDG to a 32 NL or SF, or even an EL.

No disrespect intended , I question if the poster has a preference or a bias towards the Meopta for some reason, ergo, feel , weight that could sway a preference. In many parts of his description he is saying that both binoculars are beyond his level to perceive the differences, that both are so good that it’s hard to see discernible differences. Many here know that some can differentiate every minute differences in optics.

Paul

<blockquote data-quote="Paultricounty" data-source="post: 4487828" data-attributes="member: 161667">There’s so much to unpack in the posters descriptions and opinions. There is no doubt that the Nikon EDG’s here is the superior optic In almost every way. I would love to see how that comparison would’ve been if he was comparing it to an 8x32 EDG. 7 x 42 I might say , IMO is the better overall platform, especially when comparing these two. Might be different if we were comparing the EDG to a 32 NL or SF, or even an EL.No disrespect intended , I question if the poster has a preference or a bias towards the Meopta for some reason, ergo, feel , weight that could sway a preference. In many parts of his description he is saying that both binoculars are beyond his level to perceive the differences, that both are so good that it’s hard to see discernible differences. Many here know that some can differentiate every minute differences in optics.Paul</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Paultricounty, post: 4487828, member: 161667"] There’s so much to unpack in the posters descriptions and opinions. There is no doubt that the Nikon EDG’s here is the superior optic In almost every way. I would love to see how that comparison would’ve been if he was comparing it to an 8x32 EDG. 7 x 42 I might say , IMO is the better overall platform, especially when comparing these two. Might be different if we were comparing the EDG to a 32 NL or SF, or even an EL. No disrespect intended , I question if the poster has a preference or a bias towards the Meopta for some reason, ergo, feel , weight that could sway a preference. In many parts of his description he is saying that both binoculars are beyond his level to perceive the differences, that both are so good that it’s hard to see discernible differences. Many here know that some can differentiate every minute differences in optics. Paul [/QUOTE]

Verification