• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Where premium quality meets exceptional value. ZEISS Conquest HDX.

Comparison of Bridge cameras to Digiscoping to DSLR (1 Viewer)

lmans66

Out on a cliff someplace
Supporter
Ireland
Okay...about time someone did this although I consider this only a start, others need to chime in and do the same...experiment and show side by side so folks start getting a sense of what each of these cameras can do from a distance to up close. These shots were taken from around 30-40 meters distance.

To begin with, this owl nest is right outside my backdoor..I am not disturbing them and do more disturbing this nest by turning on my car or tending to the garden than I do taking a shot of them, so please understand that. I cannot help but see them as I just look out of my patio and there they are.

Second...I took these shots under overcast skies, around 60 degrees and in the Pacific Northwest of Washington, USA.

The first two shots are from the Canon 7D plus 400 prime. Shutter was 1/1250. ISO of 250, exp -2/3, F5.6 with an effective range of 640mm. The first is uncropped while the second is cropped so I can better get an idea of comparing it to the last digiscoped shot.

The second pairings (shots 3 and 4) are from a Canon SX10 Bridge camera at 20x or around 540mm range. Yes, this is not the latest Bridge camera from Canon but in all fairness, this camera has a reputation as having one of the best opticals as it is 10mp which matches the sensor. Still a great little camera although not 35 zoom as some bridges are now. I also included an uncropped shot and a cropped shot to better match the digiscoped shot. the settings were a shutter of 1/110, F5.7, IS)100, and exp of - 1/3.

The final shot or number five is an uncropped digiscoped shot at around 1700mm. Zoom of 20 on the Swaro 80HD scope with the Canon S90 camera at 85mm. ( 20 x 85=1700 range). The settings were ISO of 100, 1/250. F4.5 and exp at -2/3.

So there you have it...the nest is around 30-40 meters from the back of my house on the cliff as I look downwards. An obvious and easy shot.

Thoughts?.... I am thinking optically that one of the latest bridge cameras when cropped would not show up any better. From my results they are pretty even. The swaro digiscoping is still much closer and I should try to crop the other images to match. But between the cropped versions of the 7D and Bridge, there isn't that much of a difference surprisingly.
 

Attachments

  • 7D uncropped E.jpg
    7D uncropped E.jpg
    231.4 KB · Views: 276
  • 7d cropped E.jpg
    7d cropped E.jpg
    246.5 KB · Views: 254
  • SX10 uncropped E2.jpg
    SX10 uncropped E2.jpg
    380.4 KB · Views: 233
  • SX10 cropped E.jpg
    SX10 cropped E.jpg
    370 KB · Views: 275
  • Swaro uncropped E.jpg
    Swaro uncropped E.jpg
    327.8 KB · Views: 332
Last edited:
I went back and cropped the Bridge Canon SX10 and the 7D to more closely match the closeness of the Digiscoped Swaro. From this ...you can easily tell the Bridge does not match up to either the Swaro Digiscoped or the 7D.

The Swaro is on the left...followed by the Bridge, followed by the 7D. The more you crop the Bridge, the more you lose ...bigtime.
 

Attachments

  • Swaro uncropped E.jpg
    Swaro uncropped E.jpg
    327.8 KB · Views: 302
  • Cropped E3.jpg
    Cropped E3.jpg
    254.9 KB · Views: 269
  • 7D cropped e3.jpg
    7D cropped e3.jpg
    298 KB · Views: 283
Warning! This thread is more than 13 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top