• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Where premium quality meets exceptional value. ZEISS Conquest HDX.

Celestron Skymaster 25x70 (1 Viewer)

Bencw

Well-known member
Hi, I have noticed these are dropping in price now, to around £75, I have been tempted to get one for a bit of sky watching, but if anyone owns or has used one be grateful for any opinions on how they perform. I have a couple of vintage bins I use now and then, a Ross 16x and Hilkinson 20x, they are not bad, but I think I would be expecting the Skymaster with newer coatings and glass to be markedly better than those.

Ben
 
. Dear Ben,
don't waste your money.
I was more or less desperate to get the 25×70 skymaster, although I think I paid less than you mention.
Firstly, I told the well-known shop to pack it well. The salesman assured me it would be.
It arrived completely loose in the box rattling around.
Knowing how fragile the 70 mm cheapies are I feared the worse. But somehow it survived unmarked and in collimation.
However, it was immediately apparent that at least the one I had was a great disappointment.
It has a lot of false colour and it is just not very good.
I have tested at least half a dozen 15×70 Revelation from telescope house and these are very much better. Although I haven't looked through the equivalent 15×70 sky master. In general, I think that the Revelation have better coatings and some of them are multicoated even on the prisms giving supposedly 92% transmission. Although some of them clearly don't have coated prisms even though the Seller thinks they do have.
I think that the Chinese factories don't know themselves what they are making. Or at least they are not consistent. Even to the same importer.

Anyway, even if my 25 x 70 sky master is poorer than most I wouldn't recommend that you get one of these. it should work but it doesn't. I think that they could have made a much better job of it.

Stick with your 20 x 70 Japanese binocular. It is probably much better
there may be a good 25×70 but I don't know of one.
Best wishes.
 
Dear Binastro,
Many thanks, comments much appreciated, I did feel a bit dubious about them anyway so will take your advice.
 
. Dear Ben,
although I said I don't know of a good 25×70 binocular perhaps you should look out for the Russian 26 x 70.
I'm not sure if this was made earlier in a Soviet version, which is likely to be better if it exists.
I think that the 26 x 70 is basically the 20×60 binocular with longer focus and larger objectives. The F ratio is probably longer than the 60 mm as a straight swap would be about 23 x 70. This may mean that the image quality is surprisingly good.

Anyway I suspect that the 26 x 70 is better than the skymaster 25 x 70 although quite a lot heavier and larger.

I have never actually seen one although I would have bought one in the past but now it is probably too heavy for me to use hand-held.
However, on a tripod it should give good views. If it is Russian then you should check it if possible as they vary more than the older Soviet optics.
 
Thanks Binastro,
I cant recall having seen a 26x70, unusual, but I will look out, weight is not an issue as they will be used with a tripod anyway, and I suspect infrequently. Russian bins and old soviet bins have in my experience been pretty good optically. I have also seen a Japanese Swift observation binocular 20x80, not much knowledge of that model, I know Swift are pretty good mostly, the Audubon and Saratoga are excellent but I also have a couple like the Belmont and Ascot which are pretty moderate.
 
. Hi Ben,
I think there are at least two main swift 20×80. One is handholdable and the other is a long focus tripod mounted version.
I think that in the American TV series Baywatch the tripod mounted long focus binocular may be the swift 20×80.
There is also a vixen 20×80, I think, that is very similar.
I think these are all Japanese and good quality.
There also may be Opticron good quality Japanese 20×80 as well as Steiner fairly lightweight which are expensive. the Steiner may actually be 78 mm aperture.
I had a 30×80 Japanese binocular that I bought for a third of the normal price new from Park cameras many moons ago. The problem was that the eye relief was minimal although the resolution was good. they had three and I tested them carefully across the park outside their shop and bought the best one for £50 or less.
 
Hi Binastro,

Less than £50 sounds good !
The Swift is the big long focus model, not for hand holding, you would need a tripod, I will keep an eye on it and see what it goes for. I have seen an used Opticron 20x80 but it's over £200, sounds a tad steep to me.
In my dreams I find a mint Zeiss 20x60 Image Stabilised binocular going for a song at a boot fair.
 
Last edited:
Ben,
The 15x70 are better than the 25x70. Look at the Vixen 80mm Giant Binoculars they make them in 20x, 30x and now in a zoom 16-40x.

Mike
 
Warning! This thread is more than 11 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top