I recently bought a well preserved pair - didn’t even require internal cleaning or collimation! They are optically excellent. Very sharp in the center, but with greater than average field curvature. The single coatings are well applied and effective. Colors are rendered surprisingly vivid and neutral. Eye relief is short but acceptable without glasses. Prisms are of BAK-7 glass, and the focus mechanism is flimsy. All in all, they exceeded my admittedly low expectations.
Hi, Angelo:
For what it’s worth, it’s probably Bk7 or Bak4, which was rarely used in those days—especially on inexpensive binoculars—and not BAK7. Bk7 is a very well-refined crown that has been the leading crown glass for photo-visual instruments for decades. Bak4 has come into prominence because it provides better off-axis throughput in SHORT-FOCUS instruments and the average binoculars works at around f3.7-f4.1. Experienced amateur astronomers say a light drop-off of 40% at the edge of the field is IMPERCEPTIBLE TO MOST OBSERVERS. Thus, is it really important?
Is BaK4 a better glass? Across the board, it is NOT! It is better for CERTAIN things.
My mother was illiterate, but she wasn’t stupid. One of the many things she taught me about the workings of the world was:
“Figures don’t lie, but liars figure.”
And with the many folks on bino forums who thrive on finding things to worry about and opto-crap to believe ... the field is white. 'Anyone want an auto-focus binocular? For you, I would offer a great deal on my oceanfront property just northwest of Wichita.
Yes, there is a BAK7—more rightfully H-BaK7. However, I certainly don’t know of a bino using it. It is manufactured by CDGM Glass in China.
I would almost always take a bino with Bak4 prisms over Bk7 prisms. However, only for perceived resale value.
Finally, I don’t mind having fun made of me; I raised 3 to adulthood. So, been there, done that, have the tee shirt. :cat:
Bill
PS The JB 207 means it was manufactured by the Hyoshi Optical Company Ltd.