• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Where premium quality meets exceptional value. ZEISS Conquest HDX.

9-banded armadillos are not an invasive species in North America (1 Viewer)

A recent study discovered 9-banded armadillo DNA from a 10,000 year old specimen in Medford Cave, Florida.

9-banded armadillos are merely recolonizing former habitat.

https://pgl.soe.ucsc.edu/shapiro14.pdf

Depends on one's definition of "invasive", I suppose. Lots of water under the bridge in 10 millennia. But how does it matter? Are armadillos currently under attack because of their "invasiveness"?
 
Last edited:
Maybe it's time us Brits recolonised former habitat too?

We've only been gone a few hundred years. I'm sure things can't have changed that much in so short a period of time.

:smoke:
 
Maybe it's time us Brits recolonised former habitat too?

We've only been gone a few hundred years. I'm sure things can't have changed that much in so short a period of time.

:smoke:

You want to? ;)

I thought 9-banded Armadillos colonised from further south? That's not invasiveness, which is generally understood to mean explosive increase of introduced species. That is normal, natural colonisation.

John
 
Depends on one's definition of "invasive", I suppose. Lots of water under the bridge in 10 millennia. But how does it matter? Are armadillos currently under attack because of their "invasiveness"?

It's legal to kill unlimited numbers of them year round because they are classified as invasive.
 
It's legal to kill unlimited numbers of them year round because they are classified as invasive.

As John's comment above, didn't Armadillos arrive in the US primarily through range expansion, not human introduction? As I understood, there is a question of origin over Florida's animals, but not over those in Texas, etc.

If so, whilst perhaps technically invasive to Florida, they are not invasive to the US, they are natural colonists (regardless of the 10,000 year old specimen). Any classification of them as invasive in this circumstance would be incorrect, so should not be used as grounds for unlimited killing.

But, are Armadillos actually being hunted on the grounds of supposed invasiveness? Or simply being hunted like many other indigenous species, such as with ground dogs, etc?
 
Warning! This thread is more than 8 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top