Same for me. I usually had several requests and went birding with maybe 3 to 4 people a year. Now I don't get any requests at all. I guess the site won't be there much longer....
André
I only became aware of the problem when we decided to go to France for the Easter break and tried to contact some locals for advice, only to find out that now you have to be "registered" or something if you wish to use the system. Eventually I used their contact form online to ask for information about the new system and they replied (soonish, maybe a day later, but they are in a distant time zone) that since I was listed as a Birdingpal I didn't have to pay to be able to contact other birders (but was encouraged to donate anyway

). I was able to get in touch with a French birder who first sent us info by email (using their system for prolonged correspondence is a pain the neck) and then proposed to meet us. We ended up meeting a couple of times and sharing a meal and we have kept in touch since.
I find that Birdingpal is a fantastic idea and, over the years, we have really enjoyed taking people to our local patches and always kept in touch afterwards. And, unlike some on this thread, haven't met many listers who just wanted a free guide (but then Italy is not a destination for listers

).
This said I, like others, have noticed a sharp decrease in requests for information in the past year or so, actually I think I have received none since the system has changed to a paying one. And this is really a shame, because I find that nothing is better than local advice for finding birds. I would be willing to pay a subscription if I was sure that the system was updated regularly, but as others have said it is showing signs of poor maintenance. |

|
Couldn't Birdforum offer such a service instead? I know that there is the "Information Wanted" forum, but not everyone checks it on a daily basis. There is also the map, but many members on it haven't been active for years. Maybe something more immediate, like a list of names (with links for sending a PM) divided by country and area would be easier to use. And of course only willing, and active, members would be listed. Just an idea. |^|