I do own a Vortex Diamondback 10x42 and am still happy with it. But now that I can afford it, the idea of buying a top class binoculars is starting to take shape.
For example the NL Pure 10x42. I thought dat I needed a 10x42.
But the Swarovski and Zeiss 10x42 seems too heavy. So I tried the NL 10x32, as well as the SF 10x32 and the SFL 10x40. In and outside the store I've had these in my hands for at least half an hour each.
The SFL immediately fell off because the so-called wow factor was missing and because the focus wheel was not in the right place for me.
The NL and SF both suited me well. The ergonomics of the SF might be a bit better, but I think the NL too could get used to. Blackouts were avoidable.
The shopkeeper insisted that I also should try the NL 8x32 and SF 8x32. I always felt it had to be at least 10x but thought, I'm here anyway, so let's see. What struck me: the slight difference in magnification!
And I observed a slightly quieter image and easier positioning.
So I have had 4 devices in my hands, and I absolutely do not know which one is or could become my favorite.
For example the NL Pure 10x42. I thought dat I needed a 10x42.
But the Swarovski and Zeiss 10x42 seems too heavy. So I tried the NL 10x32, as well as the SF 10x32 and the SFL 10x40. In and outside the store I've had these in my hands for at least half an hour each.
The SFL immediately fell off because the so-called wow factor was missing and because the focus wheel was not in the right place for me.
The NL and SF both suited me well. The ergonomics of the SF might be a bit better, but I think the NL too could get used to. Blackouts were avoidable.
The shopkeeper insisted that I also should try the NL 8x32 and SF 8x32. I always felt it had to be at least 10x but thought, I'm here anyway, so let's see. What struck me: the slight difference in magnification!
And I observed a slightly quieter image and easier positioning.
So I have had 4 devices in my hands, and I absolutely do not know which one is or could become my favorite.