Peter Boesman
Well-known member
I really need to learn to read a figure because I don't understand how they can to determine that this branch is a species and this one is a subspecies when they are of equal distance. They treat juruanus as a separate species but not costaricensis which seems older. I need more explanation
From a quick read I understand they propose to split D. certhia into 7 species (including the juruanus taxon). The main reason is if I read well that D. hoffmansi only differs 1.95% mtDNA from D. picumnus, while the 7 taxa within D. certhia differ an average 2.4%.
Obviously, an alternative treatment that is I believe equally defendable would be to lump hoffmansi with D. picumnus (hence also avoiding paraphyly in that group), a lump which has been suggested in the past by others as well.