• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

White-crested or White-bellied Tyrannulet, South Brazil? (1 Viewer)

tjbirder999

Well-known member
I had brief views of this bird at Sao Francisco de Paula near Rio Grande do Sul, south Brazil. To me, it seems much closer to White-bellied Tyrannulet, which is an uncommon winter visitor to the area, though a local (who knows way more than me on local birds, but has yet to seen White-bellied) says he thinks it is White-crested. I only have poor distant photos, but hopefully enough to identify it. Any comments welcome.
Thanks,

Tom
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2013.JPG
    IMG_2013.JPG
    42 KB · Views: 26
  • IMG_2006.JPG
    IMG_2006.JPG
    37.9 KB · Views: 17
There is also a third possibility - Straneck's Tyrannulet, which will also be possible in winter in that area. The amount of white crest shown probably eliminates Straneck's but I'm not 100% certain on that so I mention it.

Of the other two, there is a touch of olive wash to the back and the belly looks to have a bit of yellowish wash. I've looked at a lot of photos of this species trio, and it can be really hard to judge from just a photo or two, but I might lean towards White-crested also, when considering the slight clues in the photos and the fact that White-crested is the default choice in RGdS, basically.

When in the field I generally only log to species when I hear them vocalizing clearly and even then, between White-crested and White-bellied, if both are expected I really prefer to see them well and judge back and belly color as the vocalizations are similar - some still consider them conspecific (I believe HBW did not/does not have these split, actually).
 
I had brief views of this bird at Sao Francisco de Paula near Rio Grande do Sul, south Brazil. To me, it seems much closer to White-bellied Tyrannulet, which is an uncommon winter visitor to the area, though a local (who knows way more than me on local birds, but has yet to seen White-bellied) says he thinks it is White-crested. I only have poor distant photos, but hopefully enough to identify it. Any comments welcome.
Thanks,

Tom

Hmm I'm no expert here but: the only reasonably clear distinction I can see between them is that the upper parts of white-bellied are uniform grey upper parts with little or no contrast between neck and back, and [stronger] yellow wash on underparts. The latter seems a bit variable.

I'd suggest yours is white-crested, mostly because the upper parts appear quite strongly "patterned" with a clear distinction between crown, neck and back. the unders are pale yellow (supports white-bellied) but this character seems quite variable.

I don't know if there's been more recent research, but AFAIK, jury's out on whether these really are 2 different species.
 
Thanks for your comments pbjosh and THE_FERN. It looks like it is probably White-crested, though best left as uncertain. I need to get more experience with these species.

Tom
 
what's your view, and why?

[Edit]: you've clearly more experience of these than most of us...

I'd be shocked if they weren't sister species, but I'm not sure I'd lump them. They do separate by habitat and largely by range when breeding, there are plumage differences even if not always always diagnosable, there are voice differences even if not always diagnosable, and one is a seasonal migrant and the other not. The one thing I'm not certain of is what happens in central Argentina (Cordoba province and at least a bit of San Luis province) in the hilly areas where they must be breeding at least near to each other. I've not spent enough time there or read enough to know how they separate out.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 4 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top