• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Western Australia, John Forrest NP, poss Rufous Whistler (1 Viewer)

citrinella

Well-known member
We thought this was a rufous whistler but
the bill is light
it isn't very rufous.

So, is it a juvenile ?

We are not too clued up on time of breeding season. This was shot on 2/10/14, are plenty juveniles fledged by then ? it looks quite a strong bird, not obviously fluffy and new out the nest.

Mike.
 

Attachments

  • Resized_7121_RufWhisQ.jpg
    Resized_7121_RufWhisQ.jpg
    227.7 KB · Views: 50
  • Resized_7129_RufWhisQ.jpg
    Resized_7129_RufWhisQ.jpg
    308 KB · Views: 44
  • Resized_7130_RufWhisQ.jpg
    Resized_7130_RufWhisQ.jpg
    333.3 KB · Views: 41
  • Resized_7135_RufWhisQ.jpg
    Resized_7135_RufWhisQ.jpg
    289.5 KB · Views: 33
Female Rufus Whistlers look just like this.

Edit: The eye seems to be completely black which would point towards a juv. bird, but hard to be certain from these images.
 
Female Rufus Whistlers look just like this.

Edit: The eye seems to be completely black which would point towards a juv. bird, but hard to be certain from these images.

Thanks Dimitris,

We had noticed the eye colour. Pictures in one of the guides suggested adults could have dark eyes.

Actually, we are not impressed with the guides. We have Morcombe; Simpson and Day; and Slater. The latter is old and taxonomically out of date, but we definitely find the illustrations most realistic and most usable due to a simple, easy to use layout.

Thanks also to TimSG80.

Mike.
 
Thanks Dimitris,

We had noticed the eye colour. Pictures in one of the guides suggested adults could have dark eyes.

Actually, we are not impressed with the guides. We have Morcombe; Simpson and Day; and Slater. The latter is old and taxonomically out of date, but we definitely find the illustrations most realistic and most usable due to a simple, easy to use layout.

Thanks also to TimSG80.

Mike.

No problem :),

With regard to field guides: Slater and Simpson have the best illustrations. Simpson has poor text, Slater has ok text, while Morcombe has atrocious (don't bother identifying seabirds and shorebirds with Morcombe) illustrations but overall the best text. Australia could really use a Collins type field guide...

Fortunately Australian birds are generally much much easier to identify than European ones with most being very distinct and similar species having different ranges and/or calls so you don't need an excellent field guide :).

D.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 10 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top