• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

reed warbler, germany (1 Viewer)

lou salomon

the birdonist
hi,

not questioning the ID, it was a singing male reed warbler in SW germany. it just says that reed warbler has a primary projection of 70-95% (harris/tucker) or 70-100% (van duivendijk). i have measured 63% here - what did i do wrong? abraded (or raised) greater coverts, tertials etc? i'm not so good with these so i'd like to learn.
plus a pic from behind to see the primary tip spacings and one for the head profile...

jane?
 

Attachments

  • aIMG_0649---Kopie.jpg
    aIMG_0649---Kopie.jpg
    290.6 KB · Views: 79
  • aIMG_0658---Kopie.jpg
    aIMG_0658---Kopie.jpg
    238.8 KB · Views: 59
  • aIMG_0665---Kopie.jpg
    aIMG_0665---Kopie.jpg
    291.6 KB · Views: 67
Last edited:
I believe Svennson starts RW at 65%-95%....what's 2%?

I've got a RW with 3rd tertial overhanging secondaries, and if it's head was held up more......

Nothing is set in stone.
 

Attachments

  • Acro showing wing formula. June 8th '13.jpg
    Acro showing wing formula. June 8th '13.jpg
    46.5 KB · Views: 64
I'm sure slight angles and foreshortening in photos makes measuring really accurately difficult. Look at the trouble third umpires have with very low catches on TV replays, Cameras can lie!
 
Warning! This thread is more than 11 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top