• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

owl feather germany (1 Viewer)

lou salomon

the birdonist
hi

this is for white kite, CAU and of course anybody else who feels competent -i have difficulties with owl feathers (and single feathers in general).
size = 10 cm --> greater covert, or maybe a secondary?
brown colour is more buffish than it appears in the photo which produces a slight red cast to it.
there has been a barn owl breeding at exact this place 3 -4 years ago but of course the most common owl species would be tawny owl, second maybe long-eared. at least it looks like an owl feather to me (has soft inner web edge), i think kestrel (which has a family around) can be excluded?
similar thread recently on the romanian owl feather doesn't help too much: http://www.birdforum.net/showthread.php?t=148636&highlight=feather+romania

edit: after looking a bit through this site: http://www.faunoekjmueller-magdeburg.de/FederSlg__Ubersicht/federslg__ubersicht.html i still find it strange that the outer web is almost complete buffish brown, no bands, while the inner web shows much too dense bands for an owl feather of some kind. one of the innermost secondaries of kestrel? : http://www.faunoekjmueller-magdebur...ken/TurmfkM.K3.HA-Dusseldf.FlPl-1998.BECK.jpg ....no, doesn't look right.

thanks,
 

Attachments

  • eulenfeder sembach 16.8.2009_2.jpg
    eulenfeder sembach 16.8.2009_2.jpg
    127.3 KB · Views: 175
  • feder sembach 16.8.2009.jpg
    feder sembach 16.8.2009.jpg
    110.8 KB · Views: 151
Last edited:
Hi, yes this is a Kestrel secondary feather, it's very similar to some I have from a captive-bred Kestrel.
 
Last edited:
Warning! This thread is more than 15 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top