Farnboro John
Well-known member
I totally agree - the locals we rare almost universally of a tone along the lines of "oh, you're obviously looking for deer - good luck but they've all been shot" which was rather disheartening to hear. The logic a couple of people offered for this was that in addition to the forestry commission control, a couple of local landowners were hammering the deer on private land. I've no inkling as to the truth of this but thought it worth mentioning given it's frequency as a comment and a. a large number of the people we saw had huge dogs off leads which probably reduced their chance of seeing anything and b. immediately after the first of these we saw our deer. I've no doubt there's still plenty there but the feeling seems to be that the numbers are drastically lower than 3 years ago (everyone said "3 years ago"!).
Thanks. Of course, the difference is that the landowners, if they are shooting, are doing so for food and/or trophies, whereas the FC are doing it to maintain the deer herd numbers (I think I saw a figure of 350 Reds somewhere) and age structure. As you will readily appreciate, 350 deer is a population size where a local can know all the deer as individuals, so if it is true that the landowners have been heavy-handed then the FC will actually decrease their efforts - essentially their task is done for them.
I completely endorse your remarks about dog-walkers: that's one of the reasons to get there at dawn.
John